Mysterious star SO-6 traveled across the Milky Way.

  Mysterious star SO-6 traveled across the Milky Way. 

"A new study reveals that the star S0-6, located near the Milky Way’s central black hole, originated from an external galaxy, reshaping our understanding of star migration and formation in our galaxy."(ScitechDaily.com/Across Time and Space: Mysterious Star’s Epic Journey to Heart of Milky Way)

A star near the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way Galaxy originated outside of the Galaxy according to a new study. This is the first time a star of extragalactic origin has been found in the vicinity of the supermassive black hole". (ScitechDaily.com/Across Time and Space: Mysterious Star’s Epic Journey to Heart of Milky Way)

"Researchers have discovered an extragalactic star, S0-6, near the Milky Way’s central supermassive black hole. The star’s unique composition and 10 billion-year journey from a small, now-absorbed galaxy challenge our understanding of the galactic center’s star population and formation. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily.com/Across Time and Space: Mysterious Star’s Epic Journey to Heart of Milky Way)

"The central region of the Milky Way galaxy as captured by the Subaru Telescope. The image shows many stars in a field of view about 0.4 light-years across. The star S0-6 (blue circle), the subject of this study, is located about 0.04 light-years from the supermassive black hole Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*, green circle). Credit: Miyagi University of Education/NAOJ" (ScitechDaily.com/Across Time and Space: Mysterious Star’s Epic Journey to Heart of Milky Way)

Star SO-6 near Sagittarius A is born in some small galaxy near Milky Way. Then Milky Way's gravity destroyed that galaxy and pulled SO-6 to a trajectory across the Milky Way to trajectory that orbits Sagittarius A* the supermassive black hole in the middle of our galaxy. 

And why SO-6 is the only star that has made this kind of journey? Where are all other stars from the dwarf galaxy that is the origin of the SO-6? Is there some special thing that affects only SO-6? If the particle's spin in SO-6 is very high, that can push Milky Way's plasma away. Or make some other unusual interaction between Milky Way stars, gravitational fields, and plasma. 

How SO-6 could travel across the Milky Way without contact with neutron stars, white dwarfs, or black holes? That interaction would destroy the SO-6 immediately. If the spin of SO-6 is so high, it is possible, that plasma interaction with SO-6 and other stars is different. But the origin of that star in some other galaxy causes questions about the material in other galaxies. 

Even if the spectroscope sees SO-6 similar to other stars there could be differences between it and Milky Way's stars atoms and subatomic particles. Can the energy level between SO-6 and other stars be somehow different? Can the size of fermions be different in SO-6 and other stars around it? 

SO-6 is interesting. And that star can tell about star's life in those distant galaxies. So research continues. 

https://scitechdaily.com/across-time-and-space-mysterious-stars-epic-journey-to-heart-of-milky-way/

Is gravitation without quantum possible?

  The weakness of gravity makes people think that there is something very small,  hypothetical graviton,  the source of gravity. That explains why gravity is so weak. That thing would be the source of gravity waves. One of the reasons why gravity is so weak is its interaction happens in a smaller area than the other three forces. 

This means that gravitational interaction is hard to research. The other three interactions, electromagnetism, and weak and strong interactions, will cover the gravitational interaction. All three fundamental interactions or fundamental forces have pulling and pushing effects. And that means electromagnetism can cover gravitational interaction.  

Can the Pauli exclusion principle's effect with gravity theory explain dark energy and the expansion of the Universe?

The Pauli exclusion principle can explain the expansion of the universe. In that model, there cannot be two fermions in the same quantum system with the same energy level. So if two fermions have the same energy level, they start to push each other away. So in that model Pauli exclusion principle explains the Universe's expansion's accelerating speed with a large number of fermions. When the Universe's energy level decreases. More and more fermions will reach the same energy level. When those fermion's wave movement travels in the Universe that wave movement catches other wave movement. 

That has the same wavelength and frequency. Impacting wave movement raises the energy level of that traveling wave movement. And that thing kicks fermions out of each other. If that is true, there could be no dark matter. Dark matter is a material in which a particle's energy level is at the same level. And if those hypothetical WIMPs (Weakly interacting massive particles) are true, that explains the dark energy. And that means dark matter would have a similar fermion form as visible material.  

Is gravitation without quantum possible?

When we think about quantum gravity or gravity between extremely small particles, we must remember that larger particles are groups of those particles. And elementary particles form all material in the universe. So modelling the gravitational effect between electrons and protons or gluons, we can say that the model where the particle is like a whisk. Low energy balls surrounding quantum lightning or superstrings, we can model gravitational like this. Gravity is radiation with extremely short wavelengths. And when it hits those superstrings, it forms a shadow behind those strings. 

Those strings cause an effect that quantum fields travel in those shadow areas, and then they impact in the middle of the particle. So there is an axle standing wave movement in the middle of the particle. And that transports energy out from the particle from its poles or spin-axle. This standing wave will act like a laser. And it increases the energy of that radiation that impacts with it.

Reflection can explain why electromagnetic radiation increases the particle's mass. When a particle reflects radiation it takes that radiation into itself or its quantum field. Energy always travels to lower energy level space. And that energy flow continues until energy levels between space and particle are the same. 

We know that when electromagnetic radiation hits to particle, that increases its mass. So electromagnetic waves just increase the particle's energy level. That thing causes an effect that particle sends wave movement more often. 

A higher energy level in a particle. Compared to its environment increases the energy flow that travels out from the particle. When that energy flow's energy level increases it sends radiation or wave movement more often. When the period between energy bursts is high enough, that thing forms quantum low pressure around the particle. 

All particles send wave movement all the time. The reason for that is the expansion of the universe. The thing that causes acceleration of the universe's expansion is that the energy flows out from particles continues, and that energy flow pushes particles out from each other. That decreases gravitational interaction between particles, because their distance increase. However, the wave movement that travels out from particles has the same energy level. 

Because gravitation interacts with all particles and wave movement, there must be some common object there that thing touches. The dark energy is one of the things why gravitational models are so hard to make. There is a possibility that the dark energy is the interaction between WIMPS (Weakly interacting massive particles. Or its interaction with cold dark matter. 

That interaction is called "Lambda CMD (Cold Dark Matter)". This model means that dark matter has similar forms as visible matter. Dark matter has also particle and wave movement forms. However, the existence of dark matter is not completely confirmed. Dark matter may be a scattered group of low-energy wave movements or superstrings. 

If those hypothetical superstrings' energy level is lower than others that makes energy transfer to them. So in this model accelerating expansion of the universe is caused because those superstrings' or CMD-particles' energy level turns to the same. That causes an effect where those particles start to push each other away. 

There is a possibility that gravitational radiation has a similar scattering effect as all other radiation. That means that when gravitational waves travel across each other they can cut gravitational waves. That thing means that the gravitational radiation between two objects cuts. This can happen when a stronger gravitational wave crosses another gravitational wave. 

See also: 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/possible-gravity-isnt-quantum/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermion

Cold dark matter

Dark matter

Pauli exclusion principle

The similarity between human neural structure and cosmic neural structure is remarkable.

    The similarity between human neural structure and cosmic neural structure is remarkable. 

"The James Webb Space Telescope has uncovered AzTECC71, a faint galaxy that was previously elusive to the Hubble Space Telescope. This discovery by the COSMOS-Web collaboration reveals a dusty, star-forming galaxy from the early universe, suggesting a higher prevalence of such galaxies than previously believed. This finding provides new insights into the early universe’s composition and the evolution of galaxies. (Artist’s concept. See actual images below.) Credit: SciTechDaily.com" 

The cosmic web, or cosmic neural structure is one of the biggest formations in the universe. That structure is forming of galaxy groups and gas bridges that connect galaxies and galactic groups. The similarity between the human nervous system and the cosmic web is so remarkable that cosmologists, astrophysicists, and neuroscientists connect their skills to find out what causes that similarity between two very different sizes of systems. 

The requirement for an intelligent universe is the cosmic network must be as complex as human brains. But that thing is an interesting philosophical hypothesis. Cosmic intelligence could involve many internal intelligence structures. In some models, each entirety can communicate with other entirety as an entirety. In that model, the universe is a matrioshka brain, that involves thousands or even millions or billions of internal intelligent structures. 

And that causes interesting thought: can we someday communicate with the universe? I think that this possibility is purely hypothetical. But it's an interesting philosophical dilemma. Two different-sized creatures that communicate with each other are always interesting topics for discussion. 

That cosmic web causes an idea that could the entire universe be intelligent. We would be so small that we cannot interact with the universe itself.  We should create a powerful energy load so that the universe notices that impulse. 

That energy load must have a remarkable effect on those cosmic plasma flows. And there is a possibility that the cosmos doesn't understand or notice that message because it affects only one of those plasma channels. The universe must notice the change in energy levels in those intergalactic plasma channels. 

Even if, we can make enough high-energy radio impulses, it takes hundreds of years that the impulse can reach the energy that goes out from Sgr*A. And in that case, it can affect only one route of that hypothetical nervous system. If the universe is intelligent, the message between neurons travels billions of years if no wormhole allows faster-than-light transportation. But the universe has time to transport data between its participants. 

The intelligent universe theory is interesting. And the cosmic neural structure is one of the most interesting structures in the cosmos. That structure could communicate through the wormholes. Another interesting thing is that. Not only the giant network itself but also galaxies have compensation in that giant cosmic network. 

But the thought about the intelligent universe causes another interesting question. 

What is the intelligence? The quantum computers cause a question must the organism or intelligent structure be "living" in the form as we know life? Could some diamond or crystal form the structure, that acts like a brain or quantum computer using natural energy sources like very stable stars? In that model, the intelligence is the crystals that spontaneously form a quantum processor. In this kind of case the "intelligent" doesn't mean living. 

Intelligence means a structure that can handle information and generate new solutions. So the intelligent organism doesn't mean that it can interact with physical things. 

We can say that intelligence means the ability to respond to some challenge. Then, the intelligent system can develop new solutions interconnecting old models together. That ability doesn't require as powerful tools as people think. 

In those models, self-learning machines form a database from the senses that they get. The system compiles those short-term models with models that are stored deeper. And if there is something new. 

That system can connect two databases into a new entirety. But if there is a similar database, the system can use existing connections between the database and the action that the system connected with that database. This type of system is intelligent, and it knows its resources and ability to respond to challenges. 

Artificial intelligence and morphing neural networks make it possible to create biological cyborg swarms. Into the back of the wasps or flies will put microchips. Those microchips can make those bugs exchange information with other swarm members.  These things mean that the wasps are not intelligent themselves. But they can form intelligent entirety. 

These kinds of experiments are always interesting. But there is always the possibility that something unexpected happen. There is the possibility that those microchips can turn wasp swarm intelligent or make something not predicted. 

https://bigthink.com/neuropsych/brain-galaxy/

Black holes may have no singularity.

   

Black holes may have no singularity. 

Black hole research veteran Roy Kerr introduced the model that black holes might have no singularity. And we know that all black holes are not similar. Supermassive black holes seem too big being exist. The thing that dominated the black hole research was the Schwarzschild radius. The radius is the gravitational limit. That determines the event horizon's distance to the black hole's center. But the Schwarzschild radius holds only if there is a heart or nucleus in a black hole. 

If the black hole has no nucleus that means Schwarzschild radius means nothing. In some theories, supermassive black holes are gravitational fields that form virtual particles. 

Singularity is the central point of the black hole. That is the thing, that we used to think about the form of the black hole. But there is the possibility that singularity is not necessary for a black hole's existence. The idea of a black hole without a nucleus is fundamental. 

***********************************************************************

"A mathematical simulation of the warped space-time near two merging neutron stars that result in the creation of a black hole. The colored bands are gravitational-wave peaks and troughs, with the colors getting brighter as the wave amplitude increases. The strongest waves, carrying the greatest amount of energy, come just before and during the merger event itself. What occurs outside the event horizon is not practically affected by whether there is a ring singularity at the center, or some other, extended object that is non-singular.(BigThink.com/“Singularities don’t exist,” claims black hole pioneer Roy Kerr)

"Once you cross the threshold to form a black hole, everything inside the event horizon crunches down to a singularity that is, at most, one-dimensional. No 3D structures can survive intact. That’s the conventional wisdom, and has been treated as proven for over 50 years. But with rotation added into the mix, one of the assumptions of the “proof” seems to fall apart." (BigThink.com/“Singularities don’t exist,” claims black hole pioneer Roy Kerr)

"Size comparison of the two black holes imaged by the Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) Collaboration: M87*, at the heart of the galaxy Messier 87, and Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*), at the center of the Milky Way. Although Messier 87’s black hole is easier to image because of the slow time variation, the one around the center of the Milky Way is the largest as viewed from Earth. These black holes are certain to have event horizons, as we’ve imaged them. (BigThink.com/“Singularities don’t exist,” claims black hole pioneer Roy Kerr)

"When matter collapses, it can inevitably form a black hole. Roger Penrose was the first to work out the physics of spacetime, applicable to all observers at all points in space and at all instants in time, that governs a system such as this. His conception has been the gold standard in general relativity ever since. However, while it robustly applies to non-rotating black holes, there may be a flaw with the reasoning that predicts it for realistic, rotating black holes." (BigThink.com/“Singularities don’t exist,” claims black hole pioneer Roy Kerr)

"The exact solution for a black hole with both mass and angular momentum was found by Roy Kerr in 1963, and revealed, instead of a single event horizon with a point-like singularity, an inner and outer event horizon, as well as an inner and outer ergosphere, plus a ring-like singularity of substantial radius. An external observer cannot see anything beyond the outer event horizon, and if you replace the ring singularity with a non-singular object, the spacetime outside the horizon is unaffected".(BigThink.com/“Singularities don’t exist,” claims black hole pioneer Roy Kerr)

"Shadow (black), horizons and ergospheres (white) of a rotating black hole. The quantity of a, shown varying in the image, has to do with the relationship of angular momentum of the black hole to its mass. Because actual matter must collapse to form this black hole, and because the conditions that necessarily lead to a singularity are not met under this scenario, the existence of a singularity is not guaranteed." (BigThink.com/“Singularities don’t exist,” claims black hole pioneer Roy Kerr)

"When an observer enters a non-rotating black hole, there is no escape: you get crushed by the central singularity. However, in a rotating (Kerr) black hole, passing through the center of the disk bounded by the alleged ring singularity is possible, and while it might take you to an extended part of the space known as an antiverse, it could also be that the “ring singularity” is just a phantasm". (BigThink.com/“Singularities don’t exist,” claims black hole pioneer Roy Kerr)

"An animation of the orbit of a single test particle just outside of the innermost stable orbit for a Kerr (rotating) black hole. Note that the particle has a differing radial extent from the black hole’s center dependent on the orientation: whether you’re aligned or perpendicular to the spin axis of the black hole. Note also that the particle doesn’t remain in a single plane, but rather fills the volume of a torus as it orbits the black hole." (BigThink.com/“Singularities don’t exist,” claims black hole pioneer Roy Kerr)

This could be the event horizon's model. When very high-energy superstrings move near a black hole, they can push other quantum fields away. That continues until the energy level in those strings is turning so high that the outside quantum field separates from that structure. Then outside field falls into that structure.  When wave movement and particles fall in that structure, that thing can cause quantum friction that moves energy into those superstrings. Then they send energy into the middle of the event horizon. And then that energy causes gravitational pull into that vacuum. The vacuum just causes the effect that outside fields fall in it. And they take all other things with it. 

"These illustrations show two views of the active galaxy TXS 0128+554, located around 500 million light-years away.

Left: The galaxy's central jets appear as they would if we viewed them both at the same angle. The black hole, embedded in a disk of dust and gas, launches a pair of particle jets traveling at nearly the speed of light. Scientists think gamma rays (magenta) detected by NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope originate from the base of these jets. As the jets collide with material surrounding the galaxy, they form identical lobes seen at radio wavelengths (orange). The jets experienced two distinct bouts of activity, which created the gap between the lobes and the core.

Right: The galaxy appears in its actual orientation, with its jets tipped out of our line of sight by about 50 degrees."

Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center" (https://chandra.harvard.edu/press/20_releases/press_082520tiefighter.html)

***********************************************************************

In that model, the black hole is a virtual object, the cosmic void. In some models, there is a standing string or standing wave in the middle of the event horizon. In this text "string" means extremely thin wave. 

That forms when a bubble that forms after a supernova explosion falls. The quantum fields and material that drop in the void that supernova radiation form pushes some superstrings or wave movement into straight form. That wave movement turns into a stick. That is in the middle of the event horizon. That "stick" acts as an antenna that sends radiation out from the black hole. If that stick-looking structure exists it acts like a laser element. And that thing turns the black hole look like a laser

In some other models, there is a group of particles in the middle of a supernova. And when the supernova explosion happens energy pushes strings that form those particles through each other. So the particle's shell turns upside down and the inner shell turns out, and the outer shell turns in. But there is the possibility that black holes do not exist as particles or objects. 

That means they would be like some cosmic voids. When material and wave movement falls through the event horizon they hit that "stick" in the event horizon. And that radiation transmits energy out from the black hole. That explains why black holes do not expand. Otherwise, black holes expand because the universe also expands. The universe's expansion causes the effect that quantum fields inside the universe turn weaker. 

But everything is not black and white. 

So the conclusion is that maybe some black hole has a singularity in the middle of the event horizon, but that singularity is not necessary for black holes. In that model, the energy level of the supernova or event that forms supermassive black holes determines if the singularity exists. 

When a hypermassive or hyper-energy event forms a black hole, it's possible that the energy load just turns the material or particle's shell upside down. In that model the highest energy level forms so-called "empty" black holes without any singularity in their shell. 

The idea is that there might be so-called empty black holes with no singularity. The energy level of the event that forms black holes may determine if there is a singularity in black holes. If the energy level is high enough, that thing destroys singularity or turns it into straight wave. 

If a supermassive black hole is "empty" the Schwarzschild radius doesn't limit its size. 

We know that stellar and supermassive black holes do not form similarly. So that means stellar black holes might have singularity. But the supermassive black holes will not have a singularity. That means a supermassive black hole is a virtual object, whose size is not tied to Schwarzschild radius. 

In the stellar black hole, the singularity. That extremely dense material singularity determines the size of the black hole. But are all four fundamental interactions, gravity, electromagnetism, and weak- and strong interaction connected to one force? 

The fact is that in that model particles are melted to one entirety. The four fundamental forces interact so close to each other, that they act on objects with similar power. But the supermassive black holes would be more like cosmic voids. In the middle of those voids would be the stick-looking wave movement, that conducts energy and material out from the black hole. And the thing that supports this model is the jets from supermassive black holes that are visible on both sides of galaxies. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/singularities-dont-exist-roy-kerr/

https://chandra.harvard.edu/press/20_releases/press_082520tiefighter.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_radius

Iron's quantum role in planet formation.

    Iron's quantum role in planet formation. 

ScitechDaily mentions iron's quantum role in planet formation like this: "The evolution of our planet may be largely driven by the microscopic quantum state of iron atoms. Iron’s “spin state,” a quantum property of its electrons, affects its magnetic behavior and chemical reactivity. Variations in the spin state can impact whether iron is found in molten or solid form and its electrical conductivity". (ScitechDaily.com/Cracking Earth’s Deepest Secrets: Iron’s Quantum Role in Planetary Formation)

Ferromagnetism is one of the reasons why iron plays a big role in planet formation. Small-size iron bites can go together. And that makes them create the static core, a gravitational center that pulls other particles and objects into it. Iron can turn magnetic in the interplanetary magnetic field. And also the poles that form magnetic powerlines in the galaxy can create ferromagnetic phenomena in iron. 

In some models, very thin wave movement that travels through iron atoms transports energy away from iron. That wave movement acts like a thermal pump that transports energy out from iron in one direction. That thing makes a phenomenon called ferromagnetism. In very cold conditions in space, iron can turn very easily to ferromagnetic. 

The hydrogen halo around the galaxy tells that things like Sagittarius A have poles. That causes interesting visions about the interplanetary nebulas, that could involve lots of iron. It's possible that iron in those nebulas can turn magnetic, and then there could be a dominating gravitational center in the molecular nebula. 

Planet formation in nebulas around young stars is interesting. Star must collect molecular nebula around it. There must be solid and heavy elements in that nebula that rocky planets can form. Iron in those nebulas formed in stars that blasted a long time ago. 

"Deep inside rocky planets like Earth, the behavior of iron can greatly affect the properties of molten rock materials: properties that influenced how Earth formed and evolved. Scientists used powerful lasers and ultrafast X-rays to recreate the extreme conditions in these molten rock materials, called silicate melts, and measure properties of iron. Credit: Greg Stewart/SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory."(ScitechDaily.com/Cracking Earth’s Deepest Secrets: Iron’s Quantum Role in Planetary Formation)

When protoplanet formation begins the star's fusion must not begin in the wrong moment. If the fusion reaction starts before the protoplanet's mass turns high enough. That radiation from fusion in the star will not destroy those protoplanets. When fusion starts. It just pushes particles to a longer distance. 

If the distance between a star and its protoplanets is too long. Those protoplanets will turn into gas giants like Uranus. The weak solar wind will not blow gas from around those planets. And the result is gas giants or if those protoplanets are close enough they can impact together and form brown dwarfs. If a protoplanet is too close to its sun, solar wind or particle flow from that star pushes the atmosphere off the planet. If the protoplanet is not large enough that particle flow can completely push that dust away. 

The dust that forms planets requires a core that can anchor other elements around it. Without that nucleus. The dust will travel away when the solar wind blows it. 

Iron is one of the lowest energy and the most stable elements, in the Universe. In this model, iron pulls other particles into it because energy travels from higher energy particles to lower energy particles. And that means iron starts to collect other particles around it. Ferromagnetic objects also pull things like ions into them. So iron has a big quantum role in planet formation. Iron is the heaviest element that forms in a normal star's nuclear reactions. And that thing causes the effect, that iron can act as a core where other elements are connected. 

So deep inside Earth iron makes a static core. And that thing allows iron to collect other elements around it. Things like ferromagnetism make it possible for iron can form a static gravitational center, even if there are no large iron bites all around in the forming planetary system or gas nebula around young stars. 

Things like kilonovas can make heavier isotopes and elements than iron. But those things are quite rare, and heavier elements can form inside super giant stars. But the formation of those heavier elements like Uranium happens just in the last moments of those giant stars when they detonate as supernovas. 

https://scitechdaily.com/cracking-earths-deepest-secrets-irons-quantum-role-in-planetary-formation/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferromagnetism

New radical theory connects the Theory of Relativity with quantum mechanics.

 New radical theory connects the Theory of Relativity with quantum mechanics. 

"Could the two finally be unified?" (https://interestingengineering.com/science/theory-combine-einstein-quantum-mechanics)

Maybe gravitation looks like the image above. The pulling effect happens much larger area than the pushing effect. The idea is that fast-spinning objects form a small quantum vacuum near them. The magnetic- or some other field transfers that wave movement to the object's poles. There it travels out from the particle's shell. 

First time in history. Researchers connected  The Theory of Relativity with quantum mechanics. That has been a big dream for many researchers and scientists. Maybe that thing makes it possible to create the GUT (Grand Unified Theory) that connects gravity with other fundamental forces. 

The ability to connect the Theory of Relativity with the subatomic particle interaction makes an almost similar revolution in the research as quantum theories and quantum mechanics are both brought. Researchers require this theory to make complete models of the interactions between particles. 

The complete simulations require complete knowledge of the system. Complete knowledge means the ability to know interactions. The size of the interacting particles and the environment's other conditions determine the power of the force. That thing determines which of four fundamental forces dominates in that particle. Every fundamental interaction is wave movement. The wave movement's wavelength determines how it interacts with some object. 

Fundamental forces

In the subatomic world dominating forces are all similar. They can push and pull objects. And that means they all are similar to each other. That thing causes a theory that maybe gluons have poles. The idea of the GUT theory is that there is a "quantum" small particle that can be a quantum-size black hole between quark and gluon. 

That particle sends radiation that travels through the atom. When it travels through certain particle like quarks, protons and an atom's nucleus those particles and particle groups changes their wavelength. So when gluon sends radiation to gluon sends it from its shell. 

Then that radiation or wave movement travels to the quark. In a quark radiation causes resonance, and the quark sends radiation forward with its wavelength. The particle's size will determine the radiation wavelength. So why does gravitation have no repelling effect? Maybe we can find the answer from image 2 in this text. There could be an antigravitation at the point of a relativistic jet of the black hole. 

The thing is that the gravitation could be an asymmetric force. The pushing effect happens in so small area that the pulling effect covers that antigravity. 

When a black hole forms in an intense energy burst. It starts to spin at a speed that is almost the speed of light. Black holes are not slight. The superstrings that are on its shell are like mountains. And those things form an electromagnetic vacuum near the black hole. 

When those strings interact with quantum fields, that thing causes a similar effect as a non-slight ball in high-speed spin. Those small hills push quantum fields away. And when the spin is very high the quantum field has no time to fill the vacuum behind those hills. 

That vacuum pulls gravitational radiation out from singularity and a standing wave over the black hole's singularity causes the situation. That quantum field falls into the black hole or any other gravitational center that routes them to the poles of the black hole or other gravitational center. 

When an object like a black hole or its singularity spins the strings on that object form an electromagnetic vacuum near its surface. The fast spin and magnetic field drives quantum fields to the singularity's poles. There is a larger vacuum at the poles. The black hole sends radiation out from its poles. That means there could be a repelling force in gravitation. But the area where gravitation pulls things in is much larger, so the pulling effect covers that repelling effect. 

https://interestingengineering.com/science/theory-combine-einstein-quantum-mechanics

https://scitechdaily.com/reimagining-the-cosmos-new-theory-unites-einsteins-gravity-with-quantum-mechanics/

https://www.space.com/four-fundamental-forces.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory

Maybe in the distant future, we can create something that looks like antigravity.

  Maybe in the distant future, we can create something that looks like antigravity. 

So this is writing about theoretical technology. And maybe this thing will ever turn into reality. But if it's possible it's the biggest thing in history. 

In theories dark matter (or WIMP)is ring-looking material. That structure could be a quantum-size black hole and a transition disk around it. That transition disk is so small that it's smaller than the wavelengths that we can produce. Around that transition disk would be a skyrmion that makes gravitational waves travel out from that structure. But outcoming gravitational waves cannot reach it. 

In some visions, this kind of structure can make the UFO possible. In this theoretical system, the system makes skyrmion around the quarks or some other internal structures of material. Then it sends wave movement through those skyrmions. Chancing those skyrmions' direction the system can change its course in less than a second. 

And maybe someday we can make this kind of vision true. The invisibility cloak can be possible if the system can make quantum entanglement in the system between high-and-low energy particles. The system transports energy through solid material. That thing can transport wave movement into the wanted direction. Those systems can make it possible to make the craft if there are no exhaust tubes. And that can make extreme changes in its course. 

Decorative image: 

Antigravity is impossible. But maybe someday in the future. Systems can deny gravitational interaction between craft and gravitational center. That requires the ability to deny gravitational waves reach the craft. 

Antigravity is the thing that could make a revolution in spaceflight. The idea is that the gravitational pothole that surrounds all particles will turn opposite. And there is no evidence about things that happened. The idea of theoretical antigravity is that there would be some system. Many people say that antigravity is impossible. So gravitation itself will not repel anything. 

But it's possible theoretically to cut gravitational interactions between the gravitational center and the craft. The system must just deny gravitational waves reach the craft. That thing can happen using gravitational counterwaves or coherent gravitational waves. 

That system can create a network of impacting gravitational waves. Those impacting gravitational waves form networks and gravitational versions of the electric arcs. And then that network rises particles from the ground. But for success, that thing requires black holes. But that kind of thing requires very much energy. 

In some other versions, the system sends the horizontal gravitational waves to the space between the craft and the gravitational center. The horizontal gravitational waves will cut vertical gravitational waves interaction with craft. In the last version, the gravitational counterwaves will be sent against the gravitational waves that the gravitational center sends. 

And that thing forms standing gravitational waves between gravitational waves that source is in the gravitational center. Those visions have one problem. They require synthetic gravitational waves. Producing those synthetic gravitational waves requires more energy than we can produce. 

In the last version of those systems, the antimatter impact in the craft forms the energy impulse that turns the gravitational field or some other quantum field away from the craft. And that thing denies the gravitational interaction between craft and the quantum field around it.