Monday, April 21, 2025

Can the universe and black hole decay?


The image above introduces the cosmic gamma-ray background. The idea of the universe's decay is from that image. The energy seems focused in the middle of the image's equator. And if that is the major element of the entire universe that energy can push the universe into two different pieces or make it decay. 

Theoretically is possible that there are or can form two giant whirls in the universe. That form extremely large gravity centers in the universe. Those gravity centers can rip the universe into two parts. 

When we think about energy there must be something that puts energy flow. In static and stable systems energy will not flow. But the thing is that the black holes are virtually stable. 

That means black holes are spinning. That means. When their core structure spins that core binds energy inside it. 

The thing that makes black holes hard to see is that. The energy wall surrounds them. 

The black hole is invisible to outsiders because its event horizon has a higher energy level than its core. When we think about the sombrero. Model or Higgs field model the black hole's center is a fast-spinning object. That pulls energy inside it when it spins. 

The energy ditch surrounds that structure. And then the black hole's material disk forms the energy hill or energy collar around the event horizon. That means the black hole and other particles are not just like a simple sombrero. There are multiple energy ditches around particles. And that structure is called Schrödinger's hat. 

Is the universe unstable, and can it decay somewhere in the future? The universe is one of the biggest things that we can imagine. The question about the universe's decay depends on the asymmetry in the Higgs field. In a young universe, the Higgs field was symmetric. 

And unstable entirety. The Higgs field model is that famous "sombrero". And when the Big Bang happened. That field was very symmetrical. But then. There form so-called gravity centers. That caused asymmetry in that field. That asymmetry makes the universe look like some kind of amoeba rather than any pure geometrical shape. 



The Sombrero model is a simpler model of the Higgs field model. 

When the first radiation was released from the Big Bang, there were no other fields. The Higgs field traveled over nothing. 

Because there was nothing in the universe. There the Big Bang released material. Nothing limited the Higgs field expansion. The universe or matter and energy are released in a false vacuum. 

Wave movement in a false vacuum was so low energy. That it couldn't make a visible effect on the Higgs field. Then the Higgs field pushed energy to that wave movement. Forming a counter wave. 

There was no interaction between that increasing field and the "bottom". There was no energy ditch around the energy hills. When the first particles formed. 

Or that energy ditch was asymmetrical. 

When those first particles form. The lack of energy ditch caused the energy hills to fall. 

The energy ditch around the particle makes it stable. 


And if the outer shell of that structure goes too far. That can cause a situation where the particle falls from its energy hill. Or the entire energy hill falls to another side. In models, the particle can never be symmetrical. And that asymmetry causes energy flow in that structure. 



Schrödinger's hat is a completed and sharper model of the Higgs field model. The multiple energy ditch and hill structure denies the energy hill fall. Without that structure, energy hill falls immediately. "A matter wave hitting a Schrödinger’s hat. The wave inside the container is magnified. Outside, the waves wrap as if they had never encountered any obstacle. Credit: G. Uhlmann, U. of Washington" (ScitechDaily, Schrödinger’s Hat” Conceals Matter Waves Inside an Invisible Container)

That is introduced as the form of the universe. When we think of the sombrero model the particles are at the top of the energy hill in the middle of that structure, energy ditch, or lower energy level surrounds that energy hill. All energy that some particle releases doesn't travel through the bottom of the ditch. They can travel over that ditch without going to the bottom. 

But there is the possibility that some other small particle will fall into that energy ditch. That means those particles lose their energy when they come to the edge of that ditch. When energy travels over that ditch the particle forms the "hill" in that ditch. The energy that travels straight over the ditch interacts with that particle. The energy moves always in similar ways. 


"The local geometry of the universe is determined by whether the density parameter Ω is greater than, less than, or equal to 1. From top to bottom: a spherical universe with Ω > 1, a hyperbolic universe with Ω < 1, and a flat universe with Ω = 1. These depictions of two-dimensional surfaces are merely easily visualizable analogs to the 3-dimensional structure of (local) space." (Wikipedia, Shape of the universe)

When a particle's energy level rises higher than its environmental energy level. It sends that wave movement into its environment. 

And then, if the particle is in the energy ditch. That causes a situation in which energy cannot move away from that ditch. That forms the standing wave. When energy reflects between the particle and the slope of the ditch.

That forms a situation in which the particle collects energy until it can release it. And that happens only. If the particle's energy level is higher than the edge of the energy ditch. This thing forms another energy hill in the sombrero. That second energy hill and the standing wave between those energy hills just distort those energy hills away from them. 

So, when we think about the possibility that the universe decays that requires that there is some other mass center. 



"A black hole, even in radio wavelengths alone, will exhibit a large number of different features owing to the bending of light by the curved space surrounding the black hole. Some of the material from behind the black hole, some of the material from in front of the black hole, and some photons from all around it will be bent and sent off along any particular line-of-sight. No radiation generated by quantum processes outside the event horizon, known as Hawking radiation, has ever been detected." (BigThink, How come we’ve never observed a black hole decaying?)

Same way the black holes decay if they form another gravity center in the black hole. Or that another gravity center must form inside the event horizon. 

When we think about things like black hole decay. There is the possibility that black holes can also decay. The idea is that when a black hole increases its spin speed. 

That increases its energy level. So, when the spin of the black hole rises. It grows. It's possible that inside the black hole's event horizon can form a whirl. Or a black hole can eat another black hole. There is another center in the black hole. The black hole's internal structure is like an onion. The gravity field turns stronger. That is the simpler way to explain complicated things. 

When an object closes the black hole. It pulls that object inside the event horizon with the entire form of material and energy that travels into its center. But when an object closes a black hole center. The energy flow that comes back from the object presses the object to the black hole's center. When another black hole impacts a more massive black hole it can form another gravity center in its event horizon. 

That thing can start to pull material and energy into it. And that can pull information flow away from the black hole's singularity or energy tornado. In other cases. The particles that are stuck in the point of the event horizon slows the black hole's spin. That pulls fields away from the black hole's center. That thing can cause an effect. That the black hole's core structure decays. When the black hole's core decays energy or information can travel between those cores. And that makes the black hole decay. 


https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/never-observe-black-hole-decay/


https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/universe-fundamentally-unstable/


https://scitechdaily.com/schrodingers-hat-conceals-matter-waves-inside-an-invisible-container/


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe



No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

What was first: energy or the Big Bang?

The problem with cosmology is the universe’s size. When we think that gravity stretches light that means that massive objects seem to be at ...