The new theory about the 7-dimensional black hole structure tries to solve the black hole’s information paradox.

“Researchers propose that extra-dimensional spacetime torsion prevents black holes from fully evaporating, leaving remnants that preserve quantum information. Credit: SciTechDaily.com” (ScitechDaily, New 7-Dimensional Theory May Finally Solve the Black Hole Information Paradox)

What if back holes ever completely evaporate? The new 7-dimensional model, or theory, suggests that the black hole will not completely disappear. That could solve the black hole information paradox. But. That model causes an idea. That's what the black hole’s core, the singularity, is not solid. What if. It's the cluster of multiple densely packed black holes. If there is an empty space between those black holes. That explains the gravitational waves.  It can have an origin in the structures between those black holes. This model tries to explain the structure of black holes as the strings that form between densely packed black holes. Those black holes turn those strings into torsion. And we might call that structure a torsion structure. 

In that model. The form of the black hole is 7-dimensional torsion. The model is like the yarn ball model. But the structure of that thing is more complicated than a simple yarn ball; there, the information swirls around the black hole's center. In this new model, the torsion forms the confused form of those torsions. Those torsions could be the confused superstrings. And this means that the torsion structure remains in the universe, even if the black hole disappears. 

“Example of torsion mechanics” (Wikipedia, Torsion). The black hole pair turns the superstring like this. 

Energy or information that travels in those torsions. Can act. Like a thermal pump. That structure binds quantum fields into it. And that forms the gravitational pull. But could that torsion form between black holes in the massive event horizon and the gravity field? And the new question is: could that form in large-scale systems? That means that. Those torsions. They could explain the cosmic web. In that model. The comic web, or cosmic filament, forms in torsions. That connects the supermassive black holes together. 

“Unifying black hole stability and elementary particle mass via 7D geometry. Schematic illustration of the framework presented in the 7-dimensional Einstein-Cartan theory on a G2​-manifold with torsion. The left panel shows the 7D G2​-manifold torsion knot. Geometric torsion generates a repulsive force at Planck densities (central inset), stabilizing a black hole remnant.” (ScitechDaily,New 7-Dimensional Theory May Finally Solve the Black Hole Information Paradox)

Through dimensional reduction, the torsion vacuum expectation value is identified with the electroweak scale (≈246 GeV), naturally providing the Higgs field vacuum expectation value (VEV) and enabling elementary particles to acquire mass in 4D spacetime. Credit: Institute of Experimental Physics SAS” (ScitechDaily,New 7-Dimensional Theory May Finally Solve the Black Hole Information Paradox)

This causes another idea. If a black hole does not vanish. That could mean. That. The black hole remnants can form another universe after the universe disappears in the Big Freeze. The black hole will not destroy information anyway. It changes the form of information. That means it pulls the information. Or superstrings. That carries information in a straight form. Or the form of those strings is not completely straight. That means there are “holes” in the black hole structure. The superstrings are like tornadoes in the quantum fields. Have quantum vacuums inside them. In the black hole’s extreme conditions, those superstrings can connect them to other superstrings. And that forms the confused structure. Energy travels in the complex network of energy tunnels. When. We are looking. At the model of the 7D torsion. 

We might think. The structure looks like an electron shell. Of the atoms. This causes an idea. That may be electron positions in its orbital because there is some kind of tunnel at that point. This tunnel. Or some kind of lower energy point. Anchors the electron in its trajectory. So could the theory of the quantum-sized black holes be true? There is also a possibility that the black hole’s singularity is not in a solid form. What if it's the structure of the many black holes? In that model. The black hole cluster looks like an atom. There could be multiple smaller gravitational centers in the ultimate dense form of the singularity. Even if the singularity, the core of the black hole, seems solid from outside. That model means that there could be some kind of space between those structures. That means that there is a possibility that a black hole’s core can have some kind of quakes. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torsion_(mechanics)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

Does time exist only in matter, or does it exist also in space?

Time is a complex thing. 

Is it possible that time doesn’t exist? The fact is that time exists, but its form is not certain. The time can be only a matter: Or particles. Or it can be in space. When. We think. About. Time is a form of particles, or an effect that transforms particles into wave movement. When the universe expands, it. Makes quantum fields weaker. And that can turn particles into wave movement. When the universe expands, particles release energy. And that increases entropy into the system. 

Also, vaporization is an event. These particles turn into energy. And that means that free energy in the system destroys it. Particles are condensed energy fields. To stay in the form of a particle, those fields require another field. That presses against them. Without that field, the material will be vaporized immediately. 

When we think about the multiverse theory and the ability to observe other universes. The quantum fields. That means four interactions: gravity and electromagnetism. And strong. And weak nuclear interactions. Once, Albert Einstein said that everything is relative. If wave movement travels from another universe, that wave has no resistance at all. This means those waves may turn straight. And then it’s possible that they cannot reach other universes. 

Because of radiation from, for example, our universe. It doesn’t let that radiation in. The quantum field outside the universe also forms a shockwave. That doesn’t let radiation from other universes into our universe. This quantum field is a requirement for other universes. The thing that supports that model. About a quantum field. Outside the universe. It is that. Without an outside quantum field, the universe loses its energy like a balloon. Without that resistance, the universe. Ends its existence. 

Time can exist in materia. Or, it can exist in space. 

In Einstein’s model, the universe has four dimensions. Three is in space, and one is in time. Or if the time. The dimension that travels backward is independent; the universe has five dimensions. The idea is that time can travel backwards in objects. If. The escape velocity is higher than the speed of light. This event is called time dilation. Time slows in an object. When its speed approaches. The speed of light. This event doesn’t require time as a dimension. When an object travels through the universe, quantum fields touch it like a spider web. 

When a particle accelerates. Quantum fields. Act like water. It touches the particle. The particle can bind that field more effectively when it travels fast. 

When a particle’s speed decreases. It. It cannot bind as much energy as a fast-moving particle. And time moves faster. When. A particle binds more energy than it releases. Time travels in a certain direction because the past is at a higher energy level. But if the universe’s expansion can stop. And the universe starts to shrink. Does time start? To move backward? That requires that the universe has the same amount of energy. That it got from the Big Bang. 

This requires that. There is no energy flowing from the universe. Or the universe presses its fields denser. That pushes energy into the universe’s particles. The thing is that the universe leaks. There is energy that travels out from the universe, faster than matter. That means the universe’s temperature decreases. And that makes the gravitational effect stronger. 

So, if the universe starts to shrink, it might leave energy out from its edge. 

It turns younger. And when a particle releases energy, it turns older. We can say that space is an energy field. If. The energy field’s level rises. Particle’s vaporization turns slower. The energy field can affect particles by slowing or accelerating time. If we say that time means evaporation, or turning into wave motion. 

The idea of quantum gravitation is that spinning particles roll energy fields into them. That makes energy travel to the gravity center. The thing that makes quantum gravity problematic is this. Every single elementary particle in the system is the gravitational center. When those elementary particles, like quarks, roll the energy fields into them. That means those particles roll the energy field also between them. And that can destroy the material structures. 

https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/the-closer-we-look-at-time-the-stranger-it-gets

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_particle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

Scientists debunk the sterile neutrino theory. But those small particles can play a bigger role in the universe than expected.

“After a decade of precision measurements, scientists have overturned a long-standing theory about a mysterious particle once thought to hide beyond the Standard Model. Using the MicroBooNE experiment’s powerful liquid-argon detector, researchers found no evidence for the elusive sterile neutrino. Credit: Shutterstock” (ScitechDaily, After Decades of Mystery, Scientists Debunk a Major Theory About a Bizarre Particle)

When we think about the missing pieces of the puzzle. Of cosmological models. We can ask: is one of those pieces the neutrino interaction between other particles? 

Neutrinos are small, weakly interacting particles. It interacts via weak interaction and gravity. Those particles can have a bigger role in the universe. Than nobody expected. In some ideas. That may be a neutrino beam. The supernova eruption sends. It can form black holes or neutron stars. The neutrino beam or burst takes all energy from between particles. And that thing makes material fall. Into the form of neutron stars. And singularity. If the star is smaller, and the neutrino burst. It is not as strong. That forms the white dwarf. 

The neutrino beam or flow through particles can deny things like neutron decay in neutron stars. That seems ridiculous. But then we must realize that in extremely high-energy reactions. Neutrino bursts can. Take all the energy. Out of an object. That causes an effect where all electromagnetic interactions lose their effect in matter that forms stars. The neutrino burst is like a thermal pump. It takes energy with it. And that causes the effect that gravity wins. When all energy. Travels out of plasma. That means quantum fields from outside. Travel to the star and press it into an extremely dense form. 

For making that thing, the neutrino beam must have an extremely high density. But theoretically. That thing is possible. 

To exist, the sterile neutrino must form in the neutrino detector or very close to the sensor. When a neutrino travels through the universe. It collects quantum fields on it. Those quantum fields are like spider silk that the neutrino takes with it. So, that means the sterile neutrino should not exist. Another possibility is that neutrinos travel through. Some kind of wormhole.  But there are no sterile neutrinos. 

“The first use of a hydrogen bubble chamber to detect neutrinos, on November 13, 1970. A neutrino hit a proton in a hydrogen atom. The collision occurred at the point where three tracks emanate on the right of the photograph.” (Wikipedia, Neutrino)

But the role of neutrinos in the universe might be bigger than we ever thought. It’s possible that neutrinos or neutrino beams can form so-called quantum dots that can collect matter around them. Those neutrino beams can form a colder point in the matter clouds and energy fields. That can make fields and objects travel to those points. So, neutrinos can have. Quite a big role. In star and planet formation. 

Neutrinos are very small particles that can tunnel through planets. They are among the least reactive particles in the universe. This makes neutrinos interesting. When a neutrino beam travels through some objects. It transports energy out of the object. When the high-power, long-standing neutrino beam travels through objects, it acts like a thermal pump. 

The neutrino that travels. Through material. Then deny the standing wave formation. That means neutrinos can play. Some kind of role in the existence of stars and other things. If something transports energy out of objects. That thing denies the formation of standing waves. That pushes particles. Away from each other. That means those particles can prevent the star from turning into a gas cloud. When its fusion starts. 

Neutrino beams can also have the ability. To make things like sunspots or stellar spots. The last ones are sunspots on other stars. Stellar spots form when the colder point forms in a star’s plasma shell. The spot exists as long as the particle flow transports energy out of it. 

When that particle flow ends, the spot collapses. They form a nuclear reaction that sends plasma eruptions. The massive plasma eruption (MPE) forms. When there is some kind of nuclear reaction deeper in the star’s core. The thing that makes those eruptions mysterious is what launches those energy formations that cause the plasma to escape from stars. 

https://www.energy.gov/science/doe-explainsneutrinos

https://home.cern/tags/neutrino

https://neutrinos.fnal.gov/whats-a-neutrino/

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2025/11/251102205023.htm

https://scitechdaily.com/after-decades-of-mystery-scientists-debunk-a-major-theory-about-a-bizarre-particle/

https://scitechdaily.com/tiny-ghost-particles-could-explain-why-the-universe-exists/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunspot

Evolution might not be as neutral as researchers previously believed.

"Emerging research reveals that organisms may never fully catch up to their changing environments, opening new questions about how evolution really unfolds. Credit: Stock" (ScitechDaily, Evolution Is Not Neutral: New Study Challenges 60-Year Biology Theory)

Evolution bases the idea. That genetic mutation causes favorable or unfavorable changes in the species. When there are large beasts. In an area. The evolution starts to favor small-sized herbivorous animals. The outside effects are those beasts. They remove the large herbivores. From the population. That causes the enrichment. Of the genomes. Of small-sized herbivores. This means that. Some outside effects can cause. The enrichment of a certain type of genomes. And that can cause. That's some features. Of animals. Start to stand out. 

The outside effect can be the weather. Environment, epidemic, etc. But when evolution starts to enrich. Some types of genetic material. That causes mutations. Those mutations can be seen as a different living environment, a different shape, or a different behavior. This means that the members of the larger group can start discriminating against those mutated creatures. The genetic mutation can start. To create mutations. That makes the individuals look weird. In the eyes of the general population. 

This means the general population might not defend those minorities and think that they are “outsiders”. The genomes of the mutated bacteria. Might not fit. With genomes of the general groups. The large heritability might discriminate. Against their smaller companions. And that makes it hard to make descendants. Or the organism. That is adapted to a special ecosystem. Like living in caves without sunlight. Comes out of its cave. UV radiation can destroy that organism. Immediately. So, adaptation to an extreme environment can turn an organism unable to live outside that ecosystem. 

The ecosystem. That is a paradise for some species. It can be lethal for some other species.  The most common example. Among those things is a fish. Fish can live in water because they have gills. But if a fish comes out of the water, it dies quite soon. Here, I don’t handle things like lug fish. But if a human goes to the water. And tries to breathe there. Without scuba-diving equipment. Attempting to breathe underwater causes drowning. This is the description of natural evolution. 

But in the human-controlled evolution. The goal controls how researchers manipulate organisms and molecules. Sometimes those organisms are created that way. So that they have no ability to make descendants. Or they use some special nutrients that are not in natural environments. This is one thing that we must realize in the controlled evolution. The human-controlled evolution is never neutral. There are many things, like laws. That controls the evolution in laboratories. 

https://scitechdaily.com/evolution-is-not-neutral-new-study-challenges-60-year-biology-theory/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutral_theory_of_molecular_evolution

Turbulent bubbles and cosmological ideas.

"High-speed cameras capture swarms of bubbles rising through an LED-illuminated water column, revealing the chaotic flow patterns of bubble-induced turbulence. Credit: B. Schröder/HZDR" (ScitechDaily, Turbulent Bubbles Confirm a Century-Old Physics Theory)

"An international team of scientists from the Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Johns Hopkins University, and Duke University has found that a classic theory describing turbulence in fluids also explains how bubbles rising through water create chaotic motion. Their study, which tracked both bubbles and surrounding fluid particles in three dimensions, offers the first direct experimental confirmation that “Kolmogorov scaling” can appear in turbulence driven by bubbles. " (ScitechDaily, Turbulent Bubbles Confirm a Century-Old Physics Theory)

The new observations confirm a 100-year-old physics theory. When bubbles rise in the liquid, they form turbulence behind them. That thing is not very dramatic. But those bubbles that rise and form turbulence can play an unexpected role in things. Like amino acid molecule formation. That turbulence can shake the water or any other liquid. And that thing can destroy the molecule. In the same way, bubbles or ball-shaped things that fall in liquid can form turbulence between them. 

But can we turn that model into a cosmological idea? 

The turbulence behind those bubbles can create an interesting model about the dark energy. When we think that the matter or particle lose their energy when the universe expands, we can think that those particles act like some bubbles. There should be. Some kind of lower-energy space in particles. The particle acts like a bubble in the quantum fields. 

The outside quantum pressure keeps them in form. Without that outside quantum field that presses the superstring structure against that lower energy bubble, the particle turns into energy or wave movement. And its existence as a particle ends. 

So it’s possible. Those particles, when they release their energy. It will form the turbulence in those quantum fields. In modern models. The universe is a four- or five-dimensional space. And the time combination. There are three dimensions in space. And one or two dimensions in time. The number of time dimensions depends on. 

Are we separate time that moves forward from time that moves backward? In models, time moves backward only in the black holes, the places where escape velocity is higher than the speed of light. This means those fields. And space, and time act like water. Material with cosmic voids acts like bubbles. All of those particles and bubbles are moving somewhere. Because time moves forward. Or the energy level in the universe changes. All particles should form similar turbulence as bubbles form in water. In the universe’s quantum fields. 

https://scitechdaily.com/turbulent-bubbles-confirm-a-century-old-physics-theory/

Radical new theory about dark matter.

    Radical new theory about dark matter.

"An artistic illustration of the mechanism proposed by Professor Stefano Profumo where quantum effects near the rapidly expanding cosmic horizon after the Big Bang gravitationally generate dark matter particles. Credit: Stefano Profumo" (ScitechDaily, Two Wild New Theories Could Finally Explain Dark Matter)

************************************************'

Next quotes are from ScitechDaily

"One idea envisions a hidden “mirror” universe with its own particles and forces, where the early cosmos forged tiny, incredibly dense black hole–like objects that could make up all the dark matter in existence."

"Another proposes that dark matter emerged from the universe’s rapid expansion, born through quantum radiation at the very edge of the observable cosmos during a short but dramatic period after the Big Bang."

"Both possibilities are grounded in established physics, offering testable explanations that carry forward UC Santa Cruz’s tradition of connecting the smallest particles with the largest cosmic mysteries."

(ScitechDaily, Two Wild New Theories Could Finally Explain Dark Matter)

************************************************'

The new radical theory explains dark matter as it formed in the quantum fields in the young universe. Or in some other, even more exciting versions, dark matter formed in the mirror universe.  This new theory tries to explain dark matter as particles that formed just after the Big Bang. Then some of those particles stayed in a higher energy level than other material. 

We must notice that the matter that we can detect is a minority in the universe. The term "dark matter" means a gravitational effect that has no visible source. There is a model of a hypothetical tachyon particle. That which travels faster than light leaves a track or hole behind it. That channel is like a hole or a tunnel in the 3rd. Dimension. And that tunnel makes those fields move like real particles. But in that model, tachyons must exist. 

"Diagram of the Meissner effect. Magnetic field lines, represented as arrows, are excluded from a superconductor when it is below its critical temperature." (Wikipedia, Meissner effect)

In the gravitational model, Tc (temperature critical) is replaced by Mc (Mass critical). There could also be a critical density at which this thing works. So maybe singularity in black holes or energy in the event horizon makes the gravity behave like EM-fields interact with superconducting objects. Maybe that effect in gravitational form requires that the object is surrounded by an absolutely slight quantum gravity bubble that aims gravity waves around the object. In that model, the object has a slight quantum field that cannot catch and hang onto the outside quantum field around it. That makes outside fields slide around the object. 

G-(gravity)field and dark matter. There is a model that G-field or gravity waves can exist without material or other quantum fields. That means there are four fundamental interactions. Those interactions are gravity, electromagnetism, weak nuclear interaction, and strong nuclear interaction. Each of those four interactions has its individual transmitter particle. And those interactions have wave and particle forms. Three of those transmitter particles, bosons, are known. The graviton is missing a transmitter particle.

Each of them can form individual fields. Every single field has individual wavelengths. Wavelength in electromagnetic fields is different from the wavelength in the weak nuclear interaction, for example. All of those fields can exist independently. And that means: gravity- or G-field can exist without other fields. 

There is a model of dark matter that suggests it is the graviton, or an extremely small black hole. The idea is that the particle's spin is very fast. And that can form the effect that looks like a Meissner effect. That spin drives makes electromagnetic fields behave like they behave around the superconducting particle. That thing makes those particles invisible. That means that dark matter is free gravitons. 

Those things are still hypothetical particles. And proving that thing requires that dark matter have a particle form. That means things like axions or weakly interacting massive particles, WIMPs, are the same thing as gravitons. The graviton is a mythical transmitter particle that transmits gravitational waves. That particle is hard to detect. And harder to confirm. The energy flow around that particle allows it to interact. But the interaction point is too small. Or maybe the graviton is like a neutrino, and maybe it can tunnel through matter. 

Another interesting part of the new model is that. The dark matter comes from some kind of anti-universe. There is a possibility that there is a so-called anti-universe. When our universe, or the universe where we live, expands, that anti-universe falls, or reduces. That causes the idea that maybe time travels backward in that anti-universe. But that is one of the models that requires more discussion. 

The thing is that the anti-universe is the place where material turns younger because its energy level rises. Or maybe, we should say that the energy density in the anti-universe causes matter to turn younger. But can the dark matter be material where time moves backward? 

Is it possible that the dark matter is in the bubble, or the so-called WARP bubble, where it gets more energy than it releases? If WIMP or whatever the dark matter particle can be gets more energy than it releases, that means the particle travels opposite in time than all other particles. 

https://scitechdaily.com/two-wild-new-theories-could-finally-explain-dark-matter/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tachyon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle

About scientific theories

 About scientific theories

All scientific theories that we have must be based on some kind of knowledge. Or they should be based on the best available knowledge. We get our knowledge using instruments like telescopes. And that is one of the things that makes science living. Our view of the world is changing all the time, because we get new and more effective instruments to do research. That means things like JWST telescopes bring new and fundamental views into our knowledge. And still, we are looking at precisely the same things that ancient philosophers researched and thought. We know more particles than ancient philosophers. But we still look for the ultimate part of materia. 

That part is the thing that we cannot decay. This is the thing in modern science. We find smaller and smaller structures, but we cannot find the ultimate part that cannot decay anymore. We can discuss things like God. And then we can see that those questions are too hard for people. Sometimes scientists don’t talk about religion because they are afraid of anger. But the other thing is this. Some people say that God is a member of a species that visited a long time ago. That means if a person believes in God, that person believes in other extraterrestrial civilizations. 

And those things are somehow very sensitive things in science. When we talk about the SETI program, we must realize that things like species on other planets were science fiction or pseudoscience a couple of decades ago. In the 1980s, people claimed that there were no other solar systems. And today we know many other solar systems. But we don’t know any other civilization. There was one promising exoplanet where there could be phosphine and methane in its atmosphere. But then the checks deleted those observations. 

The JWST telescope is the first instrument that can research exoplanets' atmospheres. The water planets can host lifeforms like primitive algae. But can there be intelligent and technically advanced lifeforms? The answer can be something that we don’t want to find out. Maybe primitive life is quite a common thing in the universe. But intelligent and technically advanced civilizations are less common. Nobody actually knows if there is some algae in the distant waterworld's oceans until we can fly to those exoplanets. Those algae don’t make any contact with other civilizations. But if we face another intelligent species from another solar system, there is always the possibility that the contact is hostile. 

And then we must remember the dark forest hypothesis. The universe is like a dark forest. We think that we are alone. We can yell and ask if there is somebody. But we cannot know what kind of thing is in the darkness. There can be some kind of bandit waiting for the right moment to strike. And that’s why we should think carefully, if we want to make contact with other civilizations that we don’t know. 

The thing is this. We don’t know anything about the aliens. We have many hypotheses. But those hypothesis bases are in our own culture. There are no officially confirmed alien contacts. That means all our “knowledge” of the other intelligent species is purely hypothetical, or its base is in imagination. And the imagination continues until we get in contact. 

Maybe that contact comes tomorrow, maybe after 1000 years. Maybe it will ever come. The problem is that nobody can predict when the contact will come. Or maybe someday in the distant future, when the Sun turns into a white dwarf, the human civilization moves to another solar system. In that case, our species turns into many other species. When the Sun uses its fuel, humans or our descendants must leave the solar system or face extinction. But those things happen in the distant future. 

https://thatsthenatureoftime.blogspot.com

The String theory and the 5-plet problem.

"Concept image of strange particles in an atom." (InterestingEngineering)

The 5-plet is a strange 5-particle group detected in the Large Hadron Collider that can challenge String theory and give answers for Dark Matter problems. The problem is that the 5-plet must not exist in the String model. But it still exists. When we think about String theory itself, that theory seems to give answers to every problem in the universe. String theory has the same problem with the Big Bang theory. That theory is commonly accepted, even if it's incomplete. String theory is made for filling the Big Bang theory giving answers to where the material that formed the Big Bang came from. The purpose of String Theory is to answer the question: What “exploded" in the Big Bang? 

String theory is not the same as the Grand Unified Theory, GUT. Some people think that the String theory gives answers to all problems in the universe. 

That is not even close to the truth. The String theory handles small parts of the entirety. And the thing that supports some kind of superstring’s existence is the cosmic web. The main idea of the String theory is that the internal superstrings or energy channels form a dimension. And the universe is like a bubble in one extremely large superstring. Those strings also form material and everything. And every single particle is a bubble in a superstring. We often forget that the Superstring theory is a repair tool for the Big Bang theory, which should explain where the material and energy came from. 

(InterestingEngineering)

The problem with the Big Bang theory is this: it doesn’t answer one of the most critical questions in physics. Where did that energy that formed the Big Bang come from? The Big Bang theory's basement is in the wave-particle duality, WPD. That means wave movement can turn into particles and particles can turn into wave movement. But without wave movement, there are no particles. So there are many updates in the Big Bang theory. The most modern model is that time itself formed the Big Bang. And the Big Bang was rather the Big Burst than the single Bang. That means in modern models the Big Bang was a series of events that formed the material in the form as we know it. 

That means the Big Bang was some kind of annihilation, but it doesn’t answer where those particles that formed the annihilation came from. One of the suggestions for that question is that there formed a giant black hole that exploded.  That black hole could have formed from wave movement that existed before the Big Bang. Or, another suggestion is that the hypothetical black hole was a remnant of the universe that existed before our universe. The multiverse model explains the space as a dimension where Big Bangs happen all the time. And universes form in the crossing points of other universes' radiation. That radiation pushes particles or wave movement into the points where their gravitational effect starts to form new universes. 

But proving that the model is not a very easy thing. If there is material outside the universe, that material is so cold that we cannot see it. But the multiverse is a logical conclusion that begins from the galaxies, galaxy clusters, and superclusters. The idea is that the universe itself is part of a larger entirety. But then we face another way to answer the problem of where everything came from. That answer is written in a very incomplete Brane theory. The idea is that the dimension or third dimension simply collapsed. That opened the channel from the fourth dimension straight to the second dimension. That energy channel formed the event called the Big Bang. If that model can be true the 3D material cannot close that channel because its energy level is too high. 

https://interestingengineering.com/science/ghost-particles-that-could-snap-string-theory

https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/things-know-can-data-large-hadron-collider-snap-string-theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grand_Unified_Theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pion

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

The fifth force can hide in atoms.

"The Standard Model of physics doesn't account for everything we see. (ScienceAlert)

Researchers hunt for the fifth force. It is possible that the fifth force is the mirror gravitation. The idea comes from gravity’s special nature.  Gravity has no repelling effect, so can the mythical fifth force have only a repelling effect. And could that force be the key to understanding why electrons don’t fall to the atom’s nucleus? In that new model, the fifth force is the interaction between neutrons and the atom’s electron shells or electrons. 

In this model, the interaction between electron and proton and electron and neutron are separated. The fifth force could explain why dark matter became more dominating than visible material, but why does dark matter have only gravitational interaction with visible material? 

There is a possibility that the fifth force’s origin is in the subatomic particles like quarks or neutrons. If a particle looks like a whisk it can collect energy or wave movement from its environment.  So-called superstrings form that structure. That causes oscillation and that oscillation sends energy waves to the middle of the particle. When those strings oscillate they send wave movement in both directions in and out from particles. That packs energy into the particle until it can break itself out. 

There are four fundamental forces that we know. 

1 Gravity

2 Electromagnetism

3 Weak nuclear force

4 Strong nuclear force. 

So where should researchers look for the fifth force? One of the most promising places would be in atoms. Researchers know the electromagnetic interaction that is the interaction between an atom's nucleus and its electron core. But the interaction between positive protons and negative electrons has the dominating effect on that thing. The missing interaction is the interaction between neutrons and electrons. Neutrons are neutral particles. They have N and S poles and that makes a model where wave movement with N-polarity hits a neutron's S pole possible. Some kind of wave movement can leave from the neutron's equator. 

In that model, a neutron collects or focuses quantum fields from protons and then that energy flow causes radiation to the particle’s equator. The thing that makes the fifth force interesting is that force could be missing gravity’s pushing effect. An interesting thing is that gravity has no pushing effect. So the fifth force can be the missing “antigravity”. There is also another interesting detail in the neutron’s structure. Those particles exist only about 15 minutes (880 sec.) outside the atom. 

That thing means that it’s possible that the “fifth force” blows neutrons. There are only three quarks in a neutron. The higher energy down quarks-pair and one up quark. Energy flows from down quarks to up quarks. That can form the situation that the energy stretches a quantum field around those quarks. And that can cause vaporization in quarks. But when we observe atoms we must remember that we see them as entirety. We see all of those four fundamental interactions. And that means if we want to see the fifth force we must filter maybe all other forces away. 

All fundamental interactions have their own transmitter particle. They all have the wave movement form that wavelength depends on the size of the transmitter particle. So theoretically we could transform gravity straight to the electromagnetic wave movement if we have the right particle. The gravity wave is the energy ditch that travels in the universe. When that energy ditch faces a particle it pulls a little bit of energy out from the particle. That energy is the wave movement that is possible to catch. This is one of the things that can revolutionize our way of thinking about material. 

https://www.sciencealert.com/a-fifth-force-of-nature-may-have-been-discovered-inside-atoms

How hard is it to prove quantum gravity?

"In a dramatic twist on classical physics, scientists have cooled a mirror to near absolute zero with lasers to see if gravity might be quantum. This breakthrough could reshape how we understand the universe. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, MIT’s Chilling Experiment That Could Prove Gravity Is Quantum)

Quantum gravity: mass, density, and weight form gravity. And every single particle has a quantum field. The gravity is the interaction with quantum dots and the gravity center is the collection of those quantum dots. The quantum dot forms when a spinning particle binds quantum fields from around it into the particle's structure. The outcoming field denies the destruction of the particle by pressing it together. 

The spin of the particle is normally 1/2. Which means. When the particle turns its direction, it stops and releases energy. When the spin direction turns, the particle simply pushes quantum fields away from it. In that case, a particle binds energy, but that time is so short that energy cannot turn a particle into a black hole. 

If we want to turn particles into black holes. We must impact energy in it. When a particle binds energy from around it, it forms a gravity pothole. When that pothole turns deeper that pothole-particle combination pulls energy from larger and larger areas. 

The quantum gravity theory can be proven or disproven. But the idea in the quantum gravitational model is that. Every single particle in the universe has a gravity field. Quantum gravity means that all nuclear fundamental interactions have the "domination limit". There is a certain mass, size, or density of the objects. The object's size determines which of the fundamental interactions turn dominating. 

Dominating interaction between quarks and gluons is strong interaction or strong force. Dominating interaction between hadrons is a weak nuclear interaction. The dominating interaction between an atom's nucleus and electrons is the electromagnetic interaction. That makes the quantum gravity model hard to prove. The gravity wave is so weak at the quantum level that it's almost impossible to detect. Other interactions cover that effect below them. 

Dominating interaction makes atoms stay in the form. And it determines the position where subatomic particles are. Gravitational interaction affects long distances and only between large objects. Or, if we follow the recent text, we can say that gravitation forms in the entirety there are multiple gravitational centers. Or, every gravitational center involves multiple gravitational centers. 

Dark matter and quantum gravity model. 

And then we can introduce an interesting model of dark matter. Dark matter can be material that spins too fast. That spin makes them bind quantum fields inside their structures faster than they should. So, when quantum fields travel in those particles those fields pull them closer together. 

That explains why compact dwarf galaxies' stars are too close to each other. When some outside effect pulls dark matter halo out from the dwarf galaxies that causes the effect that the outside energy tries to fill those points. And that pulls stars closer to each other. When some outside gravity field pulls dark matter halo from away from the dwarf galaxy. That can turn those quantum shadows stretch. That thing makes quantum fields move to those positions that that movement releases. 

Another interesting model is that the WIMP (Weakly interacting massive particle) can be the situation that the other particle will go in some particle. That means we cannot see that other particle because the other particle covers it. So, if we think that the hypothetical graviton is that particle that gives mass to all other particles the graviton curves the quantum field or superstrings that form the whisk-shaped structure or bubble around that graviton. In some models, the graviton is the small, quantum-size black hole. 

The standard model is very functional until we face gravitation. Gravitation has no repelling effect and that makes it interesting. There are theoretical models about things like antigravity but they are not proven. 

There are models that gravity can be a mixture of other three fundamental forces, strong. And weak nuclear forces and electromagnetism. There is also a model that the spinning movement of the particles binds quantum fields to them. So when particles turn wave movement into kinetic energy. They just harness energy from around them and bind that energy to their structure. 

And then to the quantum gravity model. The idea is that all particles are quantum spots (or balls) that bind quantum fields around them. That means all gravity centers are collections of quantum dots. So, those quantum dots form all gravitational centers in the universe. The thing that forms the black holes are the internal quantum dots. 

The quantum field is like a canvas that travels through and between those quantum dots. The size of the holes, or the distance of those quantum dots determines how strong those quantum fields can be. The thing is that quantum gravity means that mass, weight, and density are things that determine the particle's gravity field. 

https://scitechdaily.com/mits-chilling-experiment-that-could-prove-gravity-is-quantum/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_interaction

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_(physics)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weakly_interacting_massive_particle