Finally, astronomers understand why black holes grew so rapidly to become so large.

“Computer visualization showing baby black holes growing in a young galaxy from the early Universe. Credit: Dr John Regan” (ScitechDaily, Astronomers Solve the Mystery of How Black Holes Got Big So Fast)

In a young, chaotic universe, the first primordial black holes were small. They formed straight from radiation. Or radiation-particle interaction. Those small primordial black holes formed in a universe that was denser. And that was. In a higher energy level. So, when somewhere in that hot universe, a black hole. That thing had more material and energy than in the modern universe. That it  could pull inside it. That matter and energy feed the black hole. That caused a situation. Where those black holes could grow very fast into supermassive black holes. 

Black holes form in the ultra-high-energy reactions in the universe. Or, actually. Those black holes form just after the supernova explosion. The energy that the star releases in the supernova explosion forms a bubble. Small cosmic void. Only a very heavy star can form a black hole. When that void starts to collapse, it crushes matter into a very dense form. And if that impact energy is high enough, it pushes matter, subatomic particles, and quantum fields into the one entirety called a singularity. 

In cases where the black hole forms in quark-gluon plasma (QGP or quark soup). That thing can raise its mass very fast. The quark-gluon plasma  formed just after the Big Bang. There formed whirls in a high-energy radiation field. The reason for that was that a space allowed the superstring’s vertical and horizontal movement. In this model, the radiation that left from the Big Bang was first coherent. But then. A free space formed in the energy field. 

Those whirls pulled so-called superstrings inside them. In that case, the Schwinger effect formed the first particles. In that space, even a micro black hole can grow its mass rapidly. And the most important question in modern cosmology is this: Which came first: particles or black holes? The model is that. The black hole can form straight from quantum fields or radiation. Those Kugelblitz back holes could form just after the Big Bang. But did they form in quark-gluon plasma or before, or after that stage? 

The minimum mass of the black hole. The Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff (TOV) limit is about 2-3 suns. When a supernova explosion happens, part of the star’s mass escapes into the universe. And that means the star’s mass must be about 5 times higher than the Sun’s mass. The mass of the supernova remnant must be so high that the neutron star collapses. That is one way to handle black holes. But the TOV equation is made for the modern universe. 

But then. We must realize that in the very young and chaotic universe, the small primordial black holes formed the mass centers. Actually, even at the beginning of the universe, when the first quarks or electrons formed. It is possible that energy travels in the electron, or some other ball-shaped object. Then the energy jumps back from inside that quantum ball. That effect can form the cosmic microvoid, which collapses. That forms a miniature black hole. Which starts. To pull energy and matter from around it. If that happens in the quark-gluon plasma, that thing can start the formation of the supermassive black holes very fast. In quark-gluon plasma, energy and matter were in a far denser formation. In those conditions, even a small black hole can grow very fast.  

https://scitechdaily.com/astronomers-solve-the-mystery-of-how-black-holes-got-big-so-fast/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kugelblitz_(astrophysics)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_black_hole

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quark%E2%80%93gluon_plasma

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tolman%E2%80%93Oppenheimer%E2%80%93Volkoff_equation

What time is it on Mars?

Time is moving faster on the red planet. This causes problems for high-precision location systems. The thing is that. Atomic clocks. They move faster in a weaker gravity field. That causes problems. for navigation on Mars and the Moon. If. Systems use GPS-style location methodology. The change in time dilation causes a difference in all systems that require highly accurate time measurement. That thing is one of the things that we should understand. 

Before. Starting to make a laboratory on the Red Planet. On the moon, where there are no clouds and atmosphere, the optical reconnaissance satellite can locate people and other things. The space suits can be equipped with a laser LED that tells the system. Who. It is in a certain location. This means the LED sends the code that the AI uses to give information on what the control or astronaut requires. 

That kind of system can connect target data. With. The topographic map. And that system can replace GPS if the astronaut is visible. The same system can also act as a communication tool. But when we think about the time dilation on different planets, the fact that time moves faster on Mars and the moon gives information about the form of gravity. 

We know that low temperature causes. The expansion. Of the atoms. In the case of a Bose-Einstein condensate, the energy level in atoms is at a minimum. The question is: does the low gravity cause a similar effect as low temperature causes in a Bose-Einstein condensate? 

If. The size of atoms and their core quantum fields expands. It turns weaker. That causes a situation. Where things like quarks can start to move. And collide in those particles. Those collimations cause free energy to be released in the system. And that energy rips it into pieces. Because. Quantum fields are weaker near a weak gravity center. The quantum field pressure against atoms should be weaker. 

The thing that causes the difference in time is that. Near. Planet Earth. Quantum fields are denser than near planet Mars. This causes an effect where particle evaporation is faster than on Earth. Quantum fields are weaker near the Red Planet. Energy or wave movement has more space. Where. It can go. 

So, we see that effect in the cases. These particles will turn into energy. Or wave movement faster. Than on Earth. On the Red Planet researchers can measure. What effect on the size of the atoms? Does the weaker gravity have? If the size of particles is larger. That allows the subatomic particle move freely. And that can cause collisions between quarks. Those collisions can affect the existence time of the particle. When quarks hit each other, they can send energy waves to the atom. Energy. What comes inside the atom can also increase the level of free energy. 

https://scitechdaily.com/what-time-is-it-on-mars-physicists-finally-have-an-exact-answer/

Hawking radiation and its meaning.

"Black holes formed of different materials should have different information encoded on their event horizons, and it is not understood if or how that information is then encoded in the outgoing Hawking radiation. Recent work from 2023 has suggested that even horizonless objects may emit Hawking radiation as well, but that result was discovered to have been ruled out in the literature historically: way back in 1975."(BigThink, It’s time to stop teaching the biggest lie about Hawking radiation)

"Hawking radiation is one of the most incredible phenomena in the Universe, which will eventually lead to the complete decay and evaporation of the most gravitationally profound objects of all: black holes. According to no less an authority than Stephen Hawking himself, this operates based on particle-antiparticle pairs spontaneously being created by the quantum vacuum, where some members escape, leading to evaporation. But Hawking’s explanation isn’t just misleading, it’s completely incorrect. Black holes don’t emit matter or antimatter via Hawking radiation, but low-energy photons. Here’s how they really evaporate." (BigThink, It’s time to stop teaching the biggest lie about Hawking radiation)

Initially, I must say that Hawking radiation is not involved in antimatter annihilation. Things. Like back hole jets and blazars, explosive galaxies can form antimatter. The antimatter form occurs when a high-power jet travels through a galaxy and its quantum fields. And those fields and their interaction with high-energy particles. Turns some of those particles’ spins opposite. And that forms antimatter particles. The origin of the Hawking radiation is somewhere near the event horizon. 

Sometimes, there is a suggestion that. Hawking radiation forms when two subatomic particles. Turn into quantum entanglement. When another part of the quantum entanglement penetrates through the event horizon, it can conduct energy out from the black hole. The event horizon is the point where the escape velocity reaches the speed of light. In that area near black holes, energy and high-energy particles orbit the singularity. Precisely at the point of the event horizon, the wave movement starts to spin around the black hole. 

There are locked photons at that point. And those photons. They can turn into quantum entanglement with other photons. In that case, the energy that is stored in or near a black hole can be conducted out from that space. In some other models, the photon that falls through the event horizon is the thing that sends energy impulses through the universe. In those extreme conditions, even the small things mean something. So, near a black hole, the photon itself can be partially in the event horizon. 

“The most common, and incorrect, explanation for how Hawking radiation arises is an analogy with particle-antiparticle pairs. If one member with negative energy falls into the black hole’s event horizon, while the other member with positive energy escapes, the black hole loses mass. And outgoing radiation departs the black hole. This explanation has misinformed generations of physicists and came from Hawking himself. One of the errors inherent to this explanation is the notion that all of the Hawking radiation arises from the event horizon itself: it does not.”(Big Think, It’s time to stop teaching the biggest lie about Hawking radiation)

That means a photon acts like an antenna that conducts energy out from the event horizon. Anyway, in all those cases, the Hawking radiation. It can have. Such a mall transmitter. That means the radiation impulse that this radiation sends. Affect in such a small area. That's it. Cannot cause a visible anomaly in the particle’s behavior. In that model, Hawking radiation. Just tunnels through particles without causing a strong enough energy transfer, so that researchers can detect it. 

The model. It goes like this: Hawking radiation is like a small string. That makes a tunnel through a particle. All particles are actually ball-shaped quantum fields. When. A high-energy radiation wave has a small diameter. And it tunnels itself through the particle. During that process, the small-diameter radiation string pushes the particle’s quantum field away from its path. The particle’s quantum field is separated from that of the string. And the edge of the hole is at a higher energy level than the string. This denies energy transfer to the shell of the particle. This is one version of the models that could explain why Hawking radiation is so strange and hard to detect. 

There is a possibility of Hawking radiation. It is like neutrino radiation. But on a smaller scale. If. We think that neutrinos play a vital role in matter formation. We can think. That. Hawking radiation has the same role. On. A smaller scale. Neutrinos can form the quantum points where neutrinos take energy away. That makes the effect. There is energy around the neutrino and channels. Neutrinos take energy with them. That makes it start to travel to that channel and neutrino. 

And that effect presses particles to that point. Neutrinos deny. The form of standing waves. In the monoatomic objects. Like hydrogen stars. Without those quantum dots, their energy can travel and conduct energy away from particles. the standing waves push particles away from each other. There is a possibility that Hawking radiation forms similar energy dots in subatomic particles. That keeps them in their form.  

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/hawking-radiation-really-work/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blazar

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation

Does dark energy exist?

"The universe’s accelerating expansion is usually attributed to an unseen force called dark energy. New research proposes that a deeper understanding of gravity and spacetime geometry might explain this behavior without invoking such a mystery. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, What if Dark Energy Doesn’t Exist? New Theory Could Rewrite Cosmic Expansion)

There are two types of energy, or quantum fields, in the universe. The local fields that surround galaxies and other gravity centers. And the global fields. These are sometimes called Higgs fields. Those fields are the base energy fields in the universe. Global fields exist in space between galaxy clusters. And they determine the minimum energy level in the universe. The expansion of the universe affects the global field more strongly than the local fields. The local field is like a bubble. That form is when energy and matter are. Pack around gravity centers. 

Like. Galaxies and black holes. Because those gravitational centers pull energy around them, the particle evaporation, or quantum evaporation, is slower around those gravity centers. When particles outside those local fields turn energy. Or wave movement faster than particles in the local fields. It can cause an effect that we cannot see. That evaporation form. When quantum fields turn weaker. Energy. 

That comes from the global field pushing local fields and turning their geometry. That quantum wind forms energy shadows that move objects inside those fields. So. When that energy hits the quantum field around the galaxy clusters. It. Forms a similar halo. The sun forms near Earth. The energy of those objects with the minimum energy level. It is not very strong, but there are lots of those objects. Far more. Than in the galaxy clusters. This means that the local fields around galaxies don’t let that energy come through them. 

The local fields are complex internal bubbles that surround stars, star clusters, galaxies, local galaxy clusters, and galaxy superclusters. Those fields make it hard to detect radiation that comes from the space between galaxy superclusters. So that energy can push the galaxy's halo. The halo around galaxies is far heavier. Than. A galaxy. When that halo moves, the galaxy in it moves. The problem is that. The galaxy is the dominant object. But the galaxy is not alone. Along. With the surrounding halos, dwarf galaxies, and star clusters, it forms the local system. The local system. It is very complex. Each dwarf galaxy has its own halo inside the main halo. Those halos are formed of dark matter and visible matter. 

That means other objects around the galaxy move in the same way relatively to the galaxy. So the virtual position of the dwarf galaxies around the massive or full-size galaxies remains the same. Or it's the same relatively to the central galaxy. Because. The local system. Remains in the same form. That means the local system moves as an entirety. The movement is hard to detect. If. The observer is that system. 

This halo is one of the things that makes it hard to detect low-energy objects. Outside. That halo. In the same way as local quantum fields, those halos are multi-layer bubbles that surround single galaxies. Local clusters. And super clusters. 

So if dark energy is the movement in the Higgs field. The next. Question is: What pushes that field into motion? The Higgs field. The base energy field is all around the universe. That field determines the base energy level in the universe. And the expansion of the universe. Causes the effect. The Higgs field turns weaker. This effect pulls energy out of particles. 

"AI-generated picture of the expansion of the universe. Credit: ZARM, Universität Bremen (AI generated)" (ScitechDaily, What if Dark Energy Doesn’t Exist? New Theory Could Rewrite Cosmic Expansion)

Again, does dark energy exist? That depends on how we determine dark energy. Is it energy? That just cannot. Travel through the galaxy's halo? Or, is it so weak energy or energy that the source is in such a small particle that we cannot separate it? The halo around the galaxy is so bright. That. We simply. Cannot see the radiation that is between galaxies. The problem is that the halo around the galaxy is so high-energy that it covers the energy. That is the particle at almost the minimum energy level. Transmits. In the case of dark energy, we should ask: What pushes energy in motion? Things like stars in the galaxy. And high energy. Shining nebulae cover that weak background radiation. Under. Radiation that comes from stars and other objects. 

The fact is that nobody knows. Dark energy can be a virtual situation that forms when the universe expands. Universe’s expansion. Causes a situation where quantum fields. Around particles turn weaker. That means material, or rather, particles, evaporate faster. This means particles turn into a wave movement. A particle is actually a pack of dense wave movement. The quantum field outside it. Keeps it in form. So when the energy level in the quantum field decreases. 

The energy level. Around the particle decreases. Particle releases wave movement. This increases energy in the universe. At the same time. When. The universe expands. The distance between objects rises. This causes the gravity effect between objects turn weaker. 

Quantum Evaporation. Along. With. A weaker gravitational effect. It can explain dark energy. Then the key problem is this: why is that thing so hard to detect? We should rather say why we cannot see that effect in small-scale systems. Things like galaxies and black holes are gravity centers. They pack energy fields around them. This means that. 

The large-scale quantum evaporation or particle evaporation. It cannot happen near galaxies. This means that the universe’s expansion doesn’t have a direct effect on the field around galaxies. Massive gravitation, along with energy that comes from stars, keeps that local quantum field, at least, more stable than the global field. The global field is the quantum field. Or the Higgs field, which is between galaxy clusters. The universe's expansion affects the global field more strongly than it affects the local field. 

https://scitechdaily.com/what-if-dark-energy-doesnt-exist-new-theory-could-rewrite-cosmic-expansion/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_energy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_field

Can antigravity be real?

"The gravitational behavior of the Earth around the Sun is not due to an invisible gravitational pull, but is better described by the Earth falling freely through curved space dominated by the Sun. The shortest distance between two points isn’t a straight line, but rather a geodesic: a curved line that’s defined by the gravitational deformation of spacetime. The notion of “distance” and “time” is unique for every observer, but under Einstein’s description, all frames of reference are equally valid, and the “spacetime interval” remains an invariant quantity." (Big Think, Ask Ethan: Why is there no such thing as antigravity?)

Theoretically, it is possible to create antigravity by putting particles into spin very fast. That spin binds energy from quantum fields around those particles. But then. If those particles spin, stop. They release energy that they bind during the spin. If. Those particles are things. That. Forms a gravity field, which makes the antigravity possible. 

Can antigravity be real? The answer is no. But theoretically, we can try to explain the theoretical model of antigravity. There is no such thing as negative mass or negative energy. But why is that thing? The model of gravity suggests that spinning particles. Form energy pothole that we see as gravity. This model suggests. That gravity forms when particles spin and bind energy from their environment. And then the other fields will fall to fill the hole that the spinning particle makes in the quantum field. This means that those fields pull. Particles. And other things with them. That thing makes the pothole, or causes the curvature in the spacetime. That. We know it as the gravity field. 

"An animated look at how spacetime responds as a mass moves through it helps showcase exactly how, qualitatively, it isn’t merely a sheet of fabric. Instead, all of 3D space itself gets curved by the presence and properties of the matter and energy within the Universe. Space doesn’t “change shape” instantaneously, everywhere, but is rather limited by the speed at which gravity can propagate through it: at the speed of light. The theory of general relativity is relativistically invariant, as are quantum field theories, which means that even though different observers don’t agree on what they measure, all of their measurements are consistent when transformed correctly." (Big Think, Ask Ethan: Why is there no such thing as antigravity?)

The antigravity can be the situation. Where. Those spinning particles stop spinning. That makes them release energy. That energy can be the antigravity, because gravity forms when spinning particles bind energy into them. And that means the antigravity is the opposite effect of those particles. In that case, the same particles that bind energy and form the gravity pothole while they spin. Simply. Release that energy. But can something like a black hole completely stop or change its direction? Normally, particles are spinning 1/2 rounds. 

When those particles are spun 1/2 round, they start to change their direction. That causes an effect. Those particles must release their energy at the point. That. They slow down. And. Start to turn. A particle releases photons or energy waves. 

"The way to make a realistic warp drive involves manipulating the energy field and the spacetime curvature of the region around a spacecraft. By compressing the space in front of you at the expense of rarifying the space behind you, it’s possible to shorten the distance between the point of origin and your destination. This requires some form of negative mass/energy to work, however."(Big Think, Ask Ethan: Why is there no such thing as antigravity?)

Like. Other wave movement types. The gravitational waves form in cases where the center of gravity releases or binds energy. When a particle’s spin changes or slows, it must release energy. So, when the gravity center, like a black hole, changes its spin speed, that forms interference in the fields around it. So the antigravity would be the effect that the spin of all particles in the gravity center stops. And sends the wave movement that the wavelength is as long as gravity waves. This kind of effect could theoretically fill that pothole. 

The thing is that if the particle has spin that is higher than one, that particle would turn invisible. So, we can think that the particles. That spin has no limit will be invisible. Because. Only cases. That. The particle sends a wave movement. Or photons make it visible. But a particle is invisible when it binds energy.  The thing that makes a black hole visible is the halo and transition disk.  That is when a black hole absorbs energy from around it. This means the energy level of those areas is extremely high. Sometimes the radiation level from those halos and material disks rises so high that those things push material away from the black hole.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_(physics)

Sterile neutrino is ruled out.

"A high-precision neutrino experiment has delivered a decisive result that challenges a long-standing explanation for mysterious signals seen in earlier studies. By carefully dissecting how neutrinos transform as they travel, researchers have narrowed the range of viable theories and set the stage for a new phase of investigation. Credit: Stock" (ScitechDaily, A 30-Year Physics Mystery Takes a Sharp Turn: This Bizarre Particle Doesn’t Actually Exist)

A sterile neutrino means a neutrino that formed straight from electromagnetic fields. If that particle exists, that means it formed in the sensor itself. The thing. That can form. The neutrino. Directly from wave movement. Are the Schwinger effect and the wave-particle duality. Even if a sterile neutrino exists, it will not remain sterile. For. A long time. And that means it's almost impossible to confirm those sterile neutrinos. 

Neutrino is the second generation of fermions. Or, sharper saying, neutrinos are members of the lepton family. Leptons are electrons, muons, and tauons. Those particles form in a weak interaction with leptons. We know three types of neutrons. Tau neutrino, electron neutrino and muon neutrino. Those particles are transformations to electrons, tau particles, and muons. 

Or, they form in reactions from muons, taus, and electrons. This means that we don’t actually know neutrinos. This means that. We don’t know. The neutrino that formed in the Schwinger effect. We don’t know. The neutrino, that form. It is direct. In. The wave-particle duality. Neutrinos are formed in the interaction when the weak nuclear force interacts with leptons. 

Sterile neutrino is ruled out, at least for a while. For being sterile, the neutrino must form in a sensor. Otherwise, if a neutrino travels only a short distance, it turns dirty. Neutrino takes quantum fields with it. This means that the neutrino turns dirty. We can call those quantum fields. As “quantum plague”. 

And. Even if a neutrino stays in a static position, it will turn dirty because the “quantum wind” makes it messy. A sterile neutrino cannot exist in our universe, or its existence remains for such a short time. That means we cannot see it. So even if a neutrino forms in the fusion reactor. It turns dirty before it reaches the sensor. The problem with sterile neutrino hunting is that nobody has seen a sterile neutrino. Reseachers see those dirty neutrinos quite often. 

Quantum fields touch those neutrinos. And those fields are left as a plague on those neutrinos that neutrino sensors detect. But the thing that makes it almost impossible to detect and confirm the sterile neutrino is that. The system must know what kind of fields are touched on those neutrinos. So, the system calculates the thickness of that quantum plague. 

If reseachers want to find sterile neutrinos, they must know how much energy, or how thick the quantum layer is through which neutrinos are collected. While their journey to Earth. But. For making those calculations, the system must know the precise point of the Big Bang, or where the neutrinos formed. Then the system must know all quantum fields between the point where the neutrino formed. And then it can calculate the quantum field that is on the neutrino. But as we know, this kind of mission is impossible. Another thing that rules out the existence of the sterile neutrino is the Pauli exclusion principle. 

“In quantum mechanics, the Pauli exclusion principle (German: Pauli-Ausschlussprinzip) states that two or more identical particles with half-integer spins (i.e. fermions) cannot simultaneously occupy the same quantum state within a system that obeys the laws of quantum mechanics. This principle was formulated by Austrian physicist Wolfgang Pauli in 1925 for electrons, and later extended to all fermions with his spin–statistics theorem of 1940.” (Wikipedia, Pauli exclusion principle). 

If. We expand this model to the universe’s scale. That means that because a neutrino is a fermion, there can be only one sterile neutrino in the entire universe. The Pauli exclusion principle means that there are no two fully identical neutrinos in the universe. So, if the sterile neutrino exists, that means there cannot be two of them. All sterile neutrinos. Are identical. That situation is impossible. If. We want to follow the Pauli exclusion principle.  

https://scitechdaily.com/a-30-year-physics-mystery-takes-a-sharp-turn-this-bizarre-particle-doesnt-actually-exist/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutrino

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion_principle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model