Skip to main content

The Cheshire cat effect debunked.


"Recent studies challenge the quantum Cheshire cat effect’s initial interpretation, highlighting the role of contextuality in quantum mechanics. This research suggests that the perceived separation of particles and their properties is a result of how quantum systems are measured, not an actual physical phenomenon. Understanding this could unlock new insights into quantum mechanics and its applications. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily.com/Dissecting the Quantum Illusion: Debunking the Cheshire Cat Effect)


The next part of the text means that the particle cannot leave or separate itself from its properties. But the particle can multiply its properties into another particle. And if the particle transfers its quantum field and quantum field's oscillation to another particle. The receiving particle's energy level rises so high level that it covers the original particle below its shine. 

The particle and its properties cannot separated from each other. And that means the Cheshire cat effect is not possible. 

The Cheshire cat-effect in quantum mechanics was a hypothesis that the particle can separated from its properties. But that thing was not possible. And the particle is always connected to its properties. 

In some models, superposition makes two identical particles. And if the energy level on the other side of the superposition steps to a far higher energy level than the other. In that model, the "shine" of the other particle covers the original particle. 

The model goes like this. First particle 1 makes superposition and entanglement with particle 2. The energy level of particle 2 turns higher than particle 1. That means the shine of particle 2 covers the particle 1. The reason why this superposition and entanglement must go like this is that explains why researchers cannot see differences in an "empty" quantum field. 

But when we think about the situation in which a particle seems to leave its properties behind it, we can think that the particle's quantum field is the thing, that we call properties. So the case should look like this. The particle disappears or changes its position. And then that particle leaves an "empty quantum field behind it". And the question is how this thing happens? 

Some other particles like quark or gluon may reach the same energy level as electrons. Quarks and gluons are far smaller than electrons. 

And if they get the same energy level or mass as electrons the electron's quantum field can make a superposition with that quantum field. The energy flow from the quark or gluon would be very strong. And that makes it very hard to detect and recognize the particle. If there is some kind of particle. The virtual particle can also have a quantum field. 

So how could researchers think during some tests particles separated from their properties? That is an interesting question. The particle leaves its position and leaves the quantum field behind it. That field acts like the particle's or particle-pairs original quantum field act. 

That thing might be some kind of virtual effect, where some particle made a superposition with some other, different types of particle, like an electron-quark pair.  Could that thing be possible? 

Theoretically electron can make a superposition with, as an example, the quark's quantum field in the case that the quark reaches the same energy level (mass) as an electron. 

So in this case, some particle that gets the same mass as the first particle can get superposition into its quantum field. The fascinating model is that theoretically is possible. That hypothetical graviton particle will reach the same energy level or mass as an electron. And that thing can form the "empty quantum field". 


https://phys.org/news/2015-06-quantum-cheshire-cat-effect-standard.html


https://scitechdaily.com/dissecting-the-quantum-illusion-debunking-the-cheshire-cat-effect/

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Researchers think that the multiverse is not fiction anymore.

Multiverse means that our universe is one of many universes. The reason why researchers and scientists believe that this is true is that logical. About 50 years ago people didn't know that there were other solar systems. Exoplanets were only theories in the 80's.  About 400 years ago people thought that our Sun was the only star in the universe. Edvin Hubble proved that our galaxy, Milky Way is one of many galaxies. Then researchers found that galaxies form groups, and supergroups. That means that today we think that the universe, where we live is the ultimate supergroup of galactic supergroups. And logically thinking there should be other universes. We believe that the universe began its existence in an event or series of events called the Big Bang. That event did not begin, because the energy that formed material should come from somewhere. The Big Bang was not one "bang" or explosion. It was a series of events where material took form. Or the energy level that it h
Post a Comment
Read more

Helium-3 production from tritium.

The fusion energy is theoretical level. The fusion systems are still at the laboratory level. That means there are many problems to overcome before commercial fusion systems. The fusion fuel can be produced from heavy water. The system bombs deuterium with neutrons. Or it can shoot deuterium or some other atoms against each other.  That can create neutron stripping, which transforms deuterium into tritium, and then the laser systems can increase the dividing speed of tritium. In that process, tritium transforms into Heluim-3 (3^He). If the system wants to produce Helium-3 for experimental or pulsed plasma rocket engines, that thing doesn't require that the Helium-3 production must be economical.  Hydrogen's heavy isotopes deuterium and tritium are the most promising fusion fuels. The problem is where the system can produce tritium or Helium3 for the fusion fuel. The 100 million K temperature allows two Heium-3 atoms can create fusion. There is the possibility to produce Hellium
Post a Comment
Read more

Is some quantum version of the bubble pulse effect behind the dark energy?

  "Dark energy’s role in propelling the universe’s accelerated expansion presents a pivotal challenge in astrophysics, driving ongoing research and space missions dedicated to uncovering the nature of this mysterious force." (ScitechDaily, Deciphering the Dark: The Accelerating Universe and the Quest for Dark Energy)  Is the universe formed in energy projection? That traveled in some kind of space vacuum. That requires. That there was some kind of energy field before the Big Bang.  Quantum field is the common name of all power fields in the universe.  Is dark energy a gravitational version of the bubble pulse effect, that detonates submarines? In the bubble pulse effect, the bubble or some other projection. That travels in the larger bubble causing a very high explosive explosion. So could that effect be possible in electromagnetic and gravitational fields? Gravitational fields differ from electromagnetic fields because of their wavelength.  In some models, the double bubble,
Post a Comment
Read more