Gravity from entropy in an interesting theory.

"Diagrammatic representation of the entropic quantum gravity action. The action for gravity is given by the quantum relative entropy between the metric of the manifold and the metric induced by the matter field and the geometry. Credit: Physical Review D (2025). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.111.066001" (Phys.org, Gravity from entropy: A radical new approach to unifying quantum mechanics and general relativity)

If we think that gravitation occurs in cases where the spinning particles store energy in the. And transform that energy into kinetic energy, we can explain special features of gravity like this. All parts of atoms are spinning. And all particles have their own individual quantum gravity field. So if we try to look at the gravity fields around atoms, we would see multiple different-sized whirls. Gluons, W, and Z bosons, quarks, and electrons conduct energy into themselves. 

But also things like quantum fields and quantum field tunnels between quarks and around the atom's spin. That spinning movement binds energy to those particles and fields. And those particles and fields turn that energy into kinetic energy. 

So, energy, or quantum fields, can also bind energy and make energy travel to those fields. In the same way as in all objects, the spin or speed of a particle or field accelerates until it starts to deliver energy. That means things like black holes will send gravitational waves that are emitted from those objects. When their spin speed slows, they start to deliver energy. Even a black hole cannot create energy from nothing. It must conduct energy somewhere if it spins more slowly. And in that process, a black hole delivers energy. As well as all other objects in the universe. 

In the same way, if we think that quantum fields form superstrings, that explains some interesting things in gravity. Theoretical superstring is the rolled quantum field. So when a superstring moves, it harnesses energy from its environment. The superstring doesn’t form energy; it harnesses and stores it from fields around it. When a superstring slows, it releases a gravitational wave or some other energy wave. Just like all other gravitational centers. 

Gravitation from entropy, or entropic gravity, is a new and exciting model to explain quantum gravity. And attempt to fit quantum gravity into Einstein's general relativity and special relativity. That model tries to connect quantum gravitation to the larger-scale gravitation. Entropic gravitation holds the idea that gravitation is like electromagnetic radiation, or one of the quantum fields.

So, if gravitation is like radiation, there should be a so-called G-field that gravitational radiation forms. That G-field or free gravitational field is like any other radiation field, but gravitational radiation or gravitational wave movement forms that G-field. The G-field could form particles because wave-particle duality (WPD) is also possible between gravitational waves. 

"Representation of the gravitational field of Earth and Moon combined (not to scale). Vector field (blue) and its associated scalar potential field (red). Point P between earth and moon is the point of equilibrium." (Wikipedia, Gravitational field)

When we think about how difficult it is to fit quantum gravity with larger-scale gravitational objects, we must dare to ask one question. Did somebody forget fields when they made gravitational models? That means spinning, or moving quantum fields, can also act like a gravity center. The idea is that a fast-spinning field also binds energy fields from around it. And that makes those fields travel to that field. 

That means in theory the field can also act as a gravity center. The idea is that particles are also waves. Or they are condensed wave movements. In reactions like annihilation, antimatter-matter impacts turn antiparticle-particle pairs into the wave movement. That means matter is packed with energy. And when a particle hits its anti-particle pair, it releases energy that is stored in particles. 

The wave-particle duality means that particles can turn into energy or wave movement. And wave movement can turn into particles. If a G-field exists and some particle spins in it, that particle also rolls the G-field in it and turns that field into kinetic energy. That is one way to close this theorem. But the other way is to think that there are no absolute vacuums in the universe. There are always some kinds of fields and things like superstrings that are extremely thin energy fields. In the same way as superstrings and particles store energy, the spinning quantum field stores energy. 

Those things form the smallest structures in the universe. When a superstring or any other structure spins, that structure stores energy into it in the form of kinetic energy. When a spinning structure turns energy into kinetic form, it harnesses that energy from around it. That makes energy move to the structure. An energy field from outside the pulling area tries to fill that energy pothole. The energy movement to the object continues until the object’s energy level rises so high that energy can break the whirl around that object. 

But again, we can replace the word spinning by using word movement. The moving particle or object, like a moving field, stores energy. If we think that entropy is space where it is moving and oscillating, that thing can explain the form of gravity. Those particles store and deliver energy, and that can explain gravity. The question is always, what causes those quantum fields to move? Moving quantum fields take particles and radiation with them. And that makes the effect known as gravity. 

https://phys.org/news/2025-03-gravity-entropy-radical-approach-quantum.html

https://www.quantamagazine.org/is-gravity-just-entropy-rising-long-shot-idea-gets-another-look-20250613/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropic_gravity

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_field

Can the quantum Coriolis force make quantum mechanics warp around the gravity centers?

"A new study reveals that even small differences in elevation between quantum computers—just one kilometer apart—can allow Earth’s gravity to measurably affect quantum systems, challenging one of the foundational principles of quantum mechanics. Credit: SciTechDaily.com". (ScitechDaily, Earth’s Gravity Might Be Warping Quantum Mechanics, Say Physicists)

The fact is that we think that gravity centers are in the middle of the whirls of the quantum fields. The strength of those whirls depends on the density and mass of the gravity centers. The most powerful whirls are around black holes. But the fact is that all gravity fields, including planets, form those whirls. The size of the whirl depends on the turbulence around the object. And the mass of the object can also determine how powerful that whirl can be. In the same way, when a particle spins, it stores energy into itself. If a spinning particle is in the quantum field, it causes an anomaly or asymmetry in the quantum field around the particle. 

The fact is that we think that gravity centers are in the middle of the whirls of the quantum fields. The strength of those whirls depends on the density and mass of the gravity centers. The most powerful whirls are around black holes. But the fact is that all gravity fields, including planets, form those whirls. The size of the whirl depends on the turbulence around the object. And the mass of the object can also determine how powerful that whirl can be. 

In an absolutely stable space, the interference is low, and even low-mass objects can form black holes if they can pull enough gas around them. If nothing disturbs, that gas can form a black hole. But near stars like the sun, the stars cause interference that destroys those structures. Every whirl disturbs their environment. And there is a thing on the surfaces of every spinning object. That means the quantum fields that whirl around the gravitational centers can form a quantum version of the Coriolis force. 

"The Earth’s gravity, manifested as curvature in space and time, is expected to alter the rules of standard quantum theory. An experiment consisting of three quantum computers at different elevations can reveal the interplay between gravity and quantum mechanics. Credit: The Grainger College of Engineering at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign"

"In the inertial frame of reference (upper part of the picture), the black ball moves in a straight line. However, the observer (red dot) who is standing in the rotating/non-inertial frame of reference (lower part of the picture) sees the object as following a curved path due to the Coriolis and centrifugal forces present in this frame." (Wikipedia, Coriolis force)

So that means all particles and objects near the gravity center, including Earth, can be in the whirl where the Coriolis force makes them spin. The Coriolis force is a fictitious force that makes anomalies in particle tracks. The coriolis force can be introduced when the particle hovers above the object, and then the object spins under it. That causes the particle to rotate against the larger object’s rotational direction. That means the Coriolis force can also exist in rotating fields. That force might be very weak. 

But in extreme conditions like over galaxy-size structures, that force turns stronger. And in other ways, we can think that the single particles are very light. That means a weak effect can interact with them and change their trajectories. Maybe anomalies in a single particle’s trajectory don’t mean much in large-scale systems. But in the quantum-scale systems, the field-based Coriolis force can cause particles to follow unexpected trajectories that are like screws. 

https://scitechdaily.com/earths-gravity-might-be-warping-quantum-mechanics-say-physicists/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_force

Time arrows and black holes.

Antigravity and Meissner effect. 

Normally, the Meissner effect is an electromagnetic phenomenon in superconducting materials. The Meissner effect happens in electromagnetic wavelengths. The gravitational Meissner effect is a similar effect that happens in the gravitational wavelength. Today, the gravitational Meissner effect is still a theory. 

Can gravity be like the Meissner effect? The Meissner effect is possible only in the extremely low temperature superconducting objects where an atom’s quantum fields form an entirety. The question is whether a similar effect that forms in gravity fields forms in cases where all parts of the atom are under one homogenous quantum field? Or is it enough that the electrons will push against the atom’s core into a homogenous form? 

If the “Gravitational Meissner effect” is possible, that makes antigravity levitation possible. If the gravitational Meissner effect is possible, that means the energy waves that travel past the particle or object are like time arrows, or arrows of time. Those things harness energy from their environment and push it into particles or particle groups. And that energy pushes those particles back in time. 

Or, otherwise saying, they cause time dilation. When the mass of an object increases, that means its spin turns faster. The spin speed accelerates until the particle cannot receive energy. Then the particle's speed starts to slow. In that process, it sends energy waves. Because it must transfer that kinetic energy somewhere. Black holes send gravitational waves when they slow their speed and release energy that is stored in them. 

The arrow of time (or time arrow) in the modern universe. 

Why doesn't the time arrow (arrow of time) work in the modern universe? There is one very good explanation. There is too much space in the modern universe. When a time arrow moves forward, it pushes energy to objects like particles around it. And then that energy pushes particles back in time. But the problem is that this requires that the particle can store the energy that it gets. In the modern universe, a receiving particle takes that energy into its quantum field. And then releases that energy immediately. 

The time arrow that pushes an object back in time requires a situation where a particle that receives energy will not give that energy away immediately. So the system must be dense enough and harness energy from a large enough area that the time arrow (or arrow of time) can push particles back in time. 

When we think about things like wormholes, those hypothetical energy tornadoes are one version of the time arrows. The wave movement tornado around the wormhole stores energy from around it. Then that energy will move to an object that travels in the wormhole. That energy can prevent an object from aging because that thing will not let the energy out from that particle or object. The case where the wormhole transports objects back in time is this. 

Diagram of the Meissner effect. Magnetic field lines, represented as arrows, are excluded from a superconductor when it is below its critical temperature. (Wikipedia, Meissner effect). Can this kind of effect be possible in the gravitational fields? In this image, Tc= temperature critical or critical temperature. The critical temperature means that below the critical temperature. The Meissner effect turns into reality. Could there also be a density critical that makes the gravity field act like EM-fields act in the Meissner effect? 

The energy level in those objects that travel in a wormhole must rise higher than the energy shadow at the front of the particle can transport that thing out from the object. The black hole is one type of time arrow. The black hole is a very fast-spinning object that collects quantum fields from around it and transforms that thing into kinetic energy. That means the black hole’s spin accelerates all the time. But that acceleration stops sooner or later. When the spinning speed of a black hole slows, it sends gravitational radiation or gravitational waves. 

When a black hole or any other particle spins in the energy field, it collects energy from that field. That thing makes an energy pothole. The pothole is the wormhole back in time. The particle can harness energy only from its environment. The thing in black hole cases is that the black hole is not eternal. It makes a hole through time. But the reason why the time arrow works in that case is that the energy field in that pothole is dense enough. The energy cannot escape from the black hole as easily as it could escape from some other objects. The black hole’s energy level can rise so high that it breaks the energy barrier around it. And that causes black hole destruction. The black hole travels back in time until it starts to deliver its energy. 

But why can gravity slow aging? The answer can be in the nature of gravity. If we think that gravity is one form of the Meissner effect, the particle that spins just makes energy fields travel past the particle. That makes quantum levitation. In the case of black holes, particles are in the same direction. And that makes the effect more powerful. The fast spin packs energy, or quantum fields, from such large areas that the object cannot release its energy through that thing. The dense material causes quantum fields to travel through the extremely dense object. Those energy fields or waves are like time arrows. They push objects in the middle of them back in time because they cannot let quantum fields travel through them. 

That means if we want to make a time machine that uses a time arrow, we should make extremely dense pearls. Then we must shoot particles or laser beams through it. That pumps energy to the structure around the channel. But for working that requires extremely dense materials. 

https://www.ecoticias.com/en/humanity-breaks-time-for-the-first-time/18338/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow_of_time

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect

The new theory about the origin of the universe.

"A radical new theory rethinks how the Universe began, using only gravity and quantum physics, no speculative fields or assumptions required. If confirmed, it could reshape our understanding of cosmic origins. Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Rewriting Physics Textbooks: Scientists Propose a Bold New Theory About the Universe’s Origins)

The material, or particles, can form wave movement. And wave movement can form from particles. We can call energy a wave movement, and material a condensed form of energy. But the problem with the origin of the universe is that material or energy cannot form from emptiness. If there were some kind of particle cloud where particles vaporized into the wave movement, the crossing points of those waves could form particles. The key elements in this new theory are De Sitter Space and De Sitter Universe. 

"De Sitter space is the maximally symmetric vacuum solution of Einstein's field equations in which the cosmological constant is positive (corresponding to a positive vacuum energy density and negative pressure).(Wikipedia, De Sitter Space)

"A de Sitter universe is a cosmological solution to the Einstein field equations of general relativity, named after Willem de Sitter. It models the universe as spatially flat and neglects ordinary matter, so the dynamics of the universe are dominated by the cosmological constant, thought to correspond to dark energy in our universe or the inflaton field in the early universe. According to the models of inflation and current observations of the accelerating universe, the concordance models of physical cosmology are converging on a consistent model where our universe was best described as a de Sitter universe at about a time t=(about)10−33 s after the fiducial Big Bang singularity, and far into the future. (Wikipedia, De Sitter universe)

The Big Bang theory is one of the most dominant cosmological models. The idea in that theory is that there came an energy spike at some point. And then that energy spike collapsed, causing an energy wave that traveled in spacetime. The problem with that model is that it doesn’t explain where that energy came from. The wave-particle duality means that the wave movement can transform into particles and particles can turn into wave movement. But the problem is that wave movement or particles cannot form from nothingness. The problem with all theories about the origin of the Universe is always where that wave movement that condensates into material came from. 

"A team of scientists proposes a new model of cosmic inflation that reveals how gravity and quantum mechanics may be sufficient to explain how the structure of the cosmos came into being. Credit: University of Barcelona’s Institute of Cosmos Sciences (ICCUB)" (ScitechDaily, Rewriting Physics Textbooks: Scientists Propose a Bold New Theory About the Universe’s Origins)

An interesting thing is this: if we take any particle cloud to the absolute vacuum, there are no quantum fields that cause particles' fast vaporization. Those particles turn into a wave movement. And that reaction can be extremely rough. So, a particle cloud can be the origin of the universe. But, where did those particles or the energy that forms those particles in wave-particle duality (WPD) come from? 

The new theory of the origin of the universe closes speculative fields. The idea is that gravitational waves and the quantum ripples caused reactions that formed the Universe. In this new model, the Bose-Einstein condensate gravitons caused a reaction that we know as the Big Bang. The Universe began with the well-established De Sitter cosmic state. So, the origin of the universe was in the condensed gravity waves. 

And the question is always where those gravitational waves that condensate into the cloud of Bose-Einstein graviton condensate came from. The problem is that nobody has seen gravitons yet. The other question is that the gravitational wave cannot travel in space; there is nothing. There must always be something or some kind of field that turns into particles. And could there be gravity in spacetime where there is absolutely nothing? 

In some models, the origin of the universe is in some kind of black hole eruption. This model only moves the problem of the origin of material and energy back, even if the so-called phoenix-universe model, where the universe collapses in a Big Crunch, forming a black hole where the entire material in the universe would be condensed into one small point. And then, because there were no quantum fields that could resist the black hole’s energy flow, the black hole erupted or detonated. But that model has the same problem as other models. Where was the original black hole and material that formed the universe? 

In some models, the universe formed from the field interaction. The idea of this model was that there was a field or wave movement before the Big Bang. Then, formed a hole in the wave field. That hole caused a situation where wave movement, which we can call energy, started to fall into that hole. That collapsing hole or bubble collected energy into the middle of it. And then that effect formed like some kind of vacuum bomb. Impacting waves formed the first particles, and then those particles formed other particles. And the problem is always the same. Where does that wave field come from? 

https://phys.org/news/2025-07-rethinking-big-gravity-quantum-ripples.html

https://scitechdaily.com/rewriting-physics-textbooks-scientists-propose-a-bold-new-theory-about-the-universes-origins/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Crunch

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Sitter_space

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Sitter_universe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_fate_of_the_universe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

Einstein was wrong and Bohr was right. (Light can have either particle or wave form, but those forms cannot exist in the same time)

 

Einstein was wrong and Bohr was right. (Light can have either particle or wave form, but those forms cannot exist in the same time)

“Schematic of the MIT experiment: Two single atoms floating in a vacuum chamber are illuminated by a laser beam and act as the two slits. The interference of the scattered light is recorded with a highly sensitive camera depicted as a screen. Incoherent light appears as background and implies that the photon has acted as a particle passing only through one slit. Credit: Courtesy of the researchers.” (ScitechDaily, MIT Just Proved Einstein Wrong in the Most Famous Quantum Experiment)

“MIT physicists have performed the most precise version of the famous double-slit experiment, using ultracold atoms and single photons to reveal the strange dual nature of light as both wave and particle.” (ScitechDaily, MIT Just Proved Einstein Wrong in the Most Famous Quantum Experiment)

“This quantum balancing act—long debated by Einstein and Bohr—was tested without traditional “spring” components, instead relying on atomic “fuzziness” to confirm Bohr’s view: you can’t observe both properties at once. The experiment not only showcases the subtleties of quantum mechanics but also revisits and resolves a historic scientific rivalry.” (ScitechDaily, MIT Just Proved Einstein Wrong in the Most Famous Quantum Experiment)

MIT proved to be one of the most interesting quantum problems. We cannot observe light as both particles and waves simultaneously. We can see light as particles or waves, but it’s impossible to see those things at the same time. That thing is very interesting if we want to create things like a quantum internet where photons transport data. The photon can act as a particle, and it can also have a wave movement form. But those two positions cannot exist in the same photon, or light quantum, at the same time. An observer can see photon particles and waves at the same time, but those waves and photons are separated, independent light quantum. 

The test is called a double-slit experiment, used to prove that light has particle and wave forms. In 1801, British scientist Thomas Young proved that light has a dual identity. The photon can be a particle or it can have a wave form. But those things are always separated. So a photon is either a particle or a wave. But those forms cannot exist at the same time in the same photon. We can introduce photons as light quanta. That means a photon can stretch to a wave or it can wrinkle to a particle. When a photon stretches, that means the photon turns flat. The stretched photon is the thing that we can see as wave movement. 

“Nearly a century ago, the experiment was at the center of a friendly debate between physicists Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr. In 1927, Einstein argued that a photon particle should pass through just one of the two slits and, in the process, generate a slight force on that slit, like a bird rustling a leaf as it flies by. He proposed that one could detect such a force while also observing an interference pattern, thereby catching light’s particle and wave nature at the same time. In response, Bohr applied the quantum mechanical uncertainty principle and showed that the detection of the photon’s path would wash out the interference pattern.” (ScitechDaily, MIT Just Proved Einstein Wrong in the Most Famous Quantum Experiment)

Einstein defended his idea of light to Niels Bohr. Einstein’s model was that the photon can have wave and particle forms at the same time. Bohr's model was that the photon can have either a particle or a wave form. And as we know, Bohr was right. The knowledge of how photons act can be key to fundamental internet and data transportation models. The system that could input data into the waves and then wrap those waves into photons can open new paths to ultra-secure data transmission. When a photon arrives at the receiver, that thing can open the package and read data from that package. 

https://scitechdaily.com/mit-just-proved-einstein-wrong-in-the-most-famous-quantum-experiment/

Uranus delivers more energy than it gets from the sun.

"Using decades of space data, scientists have cracked the mystery of Uranus’s hidden heat. While weaker than other gas giants, this internal warmth rewrites what we know about the icy planet — and fuels excitement for a long-awaited NASA mission. Credit: Shutterstock" (ScitechDaily, A Hidden Heat Source on Uranus Just Changed What We Know About Planets)

Outcoming particle flow can form a point-shaped thermal point in the atmosphere.

Can that extra energy form in friction, or in internal radioactive decay? Or does some kind of external radiation beam push energy to that planet's atmosphere? If some kind of beam of energetic particles hits Uranus's atmosphere, it forms a thermal point at that impact area. 

Uranus and its internal heat source challenge theories about planet formation. The heat source is visible in the Uranus atmosphere. That means Uranus shines more energy than it gets from the sun. There is a rocky planet inside that great atmosphere. The size of that structure compared to the planet's size is very small. That rocky planet is smaller, or its gravity is weaker than on Earth. The large atmosphere around that planet is the thing that we see when we look at that distant gas giant. The thermal source on that planet can form in a similar way to that on Earth. The mass of Uranus is far higher than that of Earth if we measure it from the highest point of the planet’s atmosphere. 

Uranus's pole can also pull high-energy particles into that planet's atmosphere. And that particle flow can raise Uranus's temperature. 

The atmosphere forms most of Uranus ' mass. The temperature of that atmosphere is about 45 Kelvin. And its top temperature is about 50 Kelvin. Or, 50 degrees over absolute zero. Hydrogen, maybe methane, and helium form that atmosphere. In theories, there was a small rocky planet somewhere in the Kuiper Belt, or in some theories, Uranus was a rogue planet that collected its atmosphere around it in extremely stable conditions. In extremely stable conditions, the small planet can collect a huge gas shell around it. The tilt axis of Uranus supports the theory that it could be some kind of rogue planet. The thing that makes Uranus interesting is that it's lighter than it should be. Neptune is far heavier, and that causes discussions about the origin of Uranus, which is the same size but far lighter than Neptune. 

The internal radioactive material, like radioactive potassium, can form an internal temperature that is measurable on Earth. Uranus’s atmosphere is far colder than Earth's, and that means that IR systems can detect that thermal source more easily than on warmer planets. The other thing is that the layers in Uranus's atmosphere don’t move at the same speed. The difference between the speeds of the atmosphere’s layers can cause friction. The laying axle of that planet means that Uranus acts like a locked planet. The temperature difference between night and day causes massive winds in its atmosphere. Uranus' rotation is 17 hours 14 minutes. But because the planet’s tilt is 82 degrees, that means Uranus turns its other pole to the Sun. 

The other explanation can be that the wind in the Uranus atmosphere forms friction at the point where gas meets ice or liquid form. That means the energy source can be in friction in the liquid or gas layers in Uranus’s structures. In models, there is liquid gas around the icy layer that surrounds the rocky layer. When energy from the sun hits Uranus's atmosphere, it raises its temperature. The thing that makes gas move is the difference in temperatures in the atmosphere. Even if Uranus has no solid surface, there can be structures that can cause friction in that planet’s atmosphere. The secrets of Uranus are big. There might be many secrets that wait for their finder in that icy and mysterious world's atmosphere. 

https://scitechdaily.com/a-hidden-heat-source-on-uranus-just-changed-what-we-know-about-planets/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranus

What does an electron do in its tunnel? (Quantum tunnels and electrons)

"Scientists have finally glimpsed what electrons do inside a quantum tunnel, revealing a surprising hidden interaction that rewrites our understanding of a fundamental physical process. (Artist’s concept). Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Century-Old Quantum Mystery Solved: Scientists Finally See Inside the Electron’s “Tunnel”)

One of the most interesting things in the quantum tunnels is that light travels faster in those tunnels than around them. The reason for that is that quantum fields that fall into those quantum tunnels move. And the speed of light is relative to its environment. So if a photon travels in a fast-moving quantum field. 

That photon travels faster than it does in a slower traveling field. Quantum fields are the environment. The speed of light is relative to the speed of the environment. Two photons in the same field travel at the same speed. But if another photon travels in a slower field, that photon in faster fields seems faster to a photon that travels in a slower field. 

The quantum tunnel is like a tube. All particles can make a quantum tunnel. And all quantum tunnels are wormholes. The Einstein-Rosen bridge is only the ultimate version of those things. Things like electrons and other particles can also make quantum tunnels.

Finally, researchers see what an electron does in its tunnel. And that opens new visions into quantum technology. When an electron travels in the medium, every single medium is a potential wall. And the electron tunnels itself through those walls. When an electron travels through the potential wall, it releases or receives energy.

So when an electron travels in the potential field, it pushes fields away and makes a tunnel through the potential wall. The tunnel that electrons make in the electromagnetic field is quite similar to the tunnel. Things like black holes are created in gravitational and quantum fields. In quantum tunneling, particles travel through the whirl-shaped potential wall. That potential wall is like a quantum tornado. 

And the thing that makes this quantum tunnel interesting is that the quantum tunnel can inject energy into that particle. The quantum tunnel sends radiation into itself. The quantum tunnel that spins like a whirl turns a higher energy level than the environment inside it. If that quantum whirl pumps enough energy into that particle, it can turn the particle into a black hole. Whether that happens depends on this: can a particle release its energy? 

If a particle is in a long quantum tunnel, energy that falls into the tunnel can push the particle to move deeper and deeper in the tunnel. If that particle cannot push energy out from the tunnel or break the tunnel around it, that means the particle's mass rises. That continues until the particle's energy level rises so high that it can break the whirl around it. Or it can push those fields behind it back. The third version is that the quantum tornado’s energy level decreases so low that particles can break it. That means the particle's energy level turns higher than the quantum tornado around it. 

"Spatiotemporal trajectory of an electron tunneling through Coulomb barrier under strong laser field. Credit: POSTECH" (ScitechDaily, Century-Old Quantum Mystery Solved: Scientists Finally See Inside the Electron’s “Tunnel”)

One of the things in the electron tunneling is that the electron's position must be stable. If an electron wobbles, it cannot make the quantum channel that is tight enough to it can pull an electron into it. 

"Diagram of the Meissner effect. Magnetic field lines, represented as arrows, are excluded from a superconductor when it is below its critical temperature." (Wikipedia, Meissner effect)

The idea is that the fast-spinning electron can form an effect. That looks like the Meissner effect. The spinning particle pulls a quantum field like a roll or a whirl. And if the particle can form a whirl that is long enough, that whirl can pull the particle through it. Quantum tunneling through walls happens when a particle makes a whirl through the wall. The whirl can form a quantum channel through an atom's quantum fields. And then the particle can push those fields away from its path. The particle will not interact with those quantum fields. And that makes it possible to teleport positrons through that channel. That thing can have at least military applications.

In a quantum internet, information can travel in electrons. Or the quantum tunnel around it can also transmit data. So, the system can send information impulses connecting them to electrons. Or it can send those energy waves in the quantum tunnel's or quantum whirl's walls. The third way is to transmit information in the form of wave movement through the quantum tunnel. The quantum tunnel can also offer the possibility of making quantum entanglement through that tunnel. That tunnel protects information that travels in the superposition. 

The idea in quantum mechanics is this. All particles make basically similar interactions with their environment. But the scale of the interactions between particles and the environment is different. That means beta radiation is basically a similar phenomenon to the wind, but the thing that moves in beta radiation is the electron. And in the wind, the thing that moves is the air molecule. But then we can think about the electron and its interaction with the environment. 

The big question is what makes the electron move. In beta radiation, the atom’s nucleus starts to send gamma radiation. That radiation makes an electromagnetic shadow in front of the particles. And that shadow pulls electrons into it. 

The answer can be in the thing that is similar to the Meissner effect. When the electron spin is high enough, that thing makes the electromagnetic whirl around it. Or the structures on the electron's shell touch the quantum field and start to roll it around the electron. When that channel starts to grow long enough and the energy level on the other side is higher than the other, that makes electrons travel in the channel or tunnel. 

That makes it possible to create a quantum internet that is more effective and secure than anything before. The electron can transport information between two points. But the problem is this: if researchers don’t know all parts of its interactions, and an electron touches its tunnel, that destroys information immediately. 

https://scitechdaily.com/century-old-quantum-mystery-solved-scientists-finally-see-inside-the-electrons-tunnel/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_tunnelling