Skip to main content

Does Heisenberg's uncertainty principle fall, because the attosecond technology gives so accurate values?

   Does Heisenberg's uncertainty principle fall, because the attosecond technology gives so accurate values?


We can increase our accuracy forever. That helps us to see things that are not been possible before. And if we want to determine at the same time the electron's movement or "where the electron is going" and "the point where the electron is"  we cannot get very accurate values. But we cannot get precise values. 

When we increase accuracy we can get so close to precise or absolute values that errors lose their effect and meaning for values. But there still is minimal error. That has no practical meaning for values and tests. So the focus in those measurements is, or it should be to minimize the uncertainty effect from measurements. 

Together those things are limits or limit values (sometimes called limes). The value is close to the precise target value, but it never reaches it. The electron curtain is a combination of wave movement and particle-form electrons. 



One cannot simultaneously determine the position and momentum of an electron". That is the quote called Heisenberg's uncertainty Principle. The uncertainty means that we must accept certain error levels. "You can find out where the electron is, but not where it's going." Or "You can determine where the electron is going, but not where it is". So you can determine the Delta Vector (Change of place) of the electron but not the point where the electron is. The reason, why all measurements about that thing are wrong is that an electron is moving when information travels out from it. 

When information travels between the sensor and electron, that takes a small moment because the information has a speed limit which is the speed of light. So we can make very accurate measurements about that topic, but at the same time (or moment) we can't determine the change of the electron's position and electron's precise point. But if we separate those missions we can very accurately determine the electron's precise location point at a certain moment. Otherwise, we can determine very accurately the change between two positions where the electron is between certain time units. 

In the uncertainty Principle, the certainty is not precisely determined. The certainty is limited in values. The limit is the marginal where the result can be acceptable. That means we can take the focus to the system, and make the more accurate information about the particle's position, but we cannot reach absolute certainty. This means that Heisenberg's uncertainty Principle is one of the things that can fall, but at the same time, it remains forever. The idea of Heisenberg's uncertainty Principle is that we can determine the electron's position in the orbitals. The attosecond systems can make it possible to reach more and more accurate images of the electron's position. But that position is not precisely determined. 

https://www.mikrobitti.fi/uutiset/heisenbergin-ennustus-kumottu-tallaiset-loydokset-toivat-fysiikan-nobel-palkinnon-2023/cc8418e2-c5fb-4157-8763-2d6908f56948

https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2023/summary/

https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/cen-10133-scicon2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limit_(mathematics)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Researchers think that the multiverse is not fiction anymore.

Multiverse means that our universe is one of many universes. The reason why researchers and scientists believe that this is true is that logical. About 50 years ago people didn't know that there were other solar systems. Exoplanets were only theories in the 80's.  About 400 years ago people thought that our Sun was the only star in the universe. Edvin Hubble proved that our galaxy, Milky Way is one of many galaxies. Then researchers found that galaxies form groups, and supergroups. That means that today we think that the universe, where we live is the ultimate supergroup of galactic supergroups. And logically thinking there should be other universes. We believe that the universe began its existence in an event or series of events called the Big Bang. That event did not begin, because the energy that formed material should come from somewhere. The Big Bang was not one "bang" or explosion. It was a series of events where material took form. Or the energy level that it h
Post a Comment
Read more

Helium-3 production from tritium.

The fusion energy is theoretical level. The fusion systems are still at the laboratory level. That means there are many problems to overcome before commercial fusion systems. The fusion fuel can be produced from heavy water. The system bombs deuterium with neutrons. Or it can shoot deuterium or some other atoms against each other.  That can create neutron stripping, which transforms deuterium into tritium, and then the laser systems can increase the dividing speed of tritium. In that process, tritium transforms into Heluim-3 (3^He). If the system wants to produce Helium-3 for experimental or pulsed plasma rocket engines, that thing doesn't require that the Helium-3 production must be economical.  Hydrogen's heavy isotopes deuterium and tritium are the most promising fusion fuels. The problem is where the system can produce tritium or Helium3 for the fusion fuel. The 100 million K temperature allows two Heium-3 atoms can create fusion. There is the possibility to produce Hellium
Post a Comment
Read more

Is some quantum version of the bubble pulse effect behind the dark energy?

  "Dark energy’s role in propelling the universe’s accelerated expansion presents a pivotal challenge in astrophysics, driving ongoing research and space missions dedicated to uncovering the nature of this mysterious force." (ScitechDaily, Deciphering the Dark: The Accelerating Universe and the Quest for Dark Energy)  Is the universe formed in energy projection? That traveled in some kind of space vacuum. That requires. That there was some kind of energy field before the Big Bang.  Quantum field is the common name of all power fields in the universe.  Is dark energy a gravitational version of the bubble pulse effect, that detonates submarines? In the bubble pulse effect, the bubble or some other projection. That travels in the larger bubble causing a very high explosive explosion. So could that effect be possible in electromagnetic and gravitational fields? Gravitational fields differ from electromagnetic fields because of their wavelength.  In some models, the double bubble,
Post a Comment
Read more