Skip to main content

Can the charm or c quark explain why a photon has no mass?


Can the mass of charm quark or c quark open the road to the photonic mystery? Can the reason why the c-quark that is inside the proton can be heavier than the proton? The c quark is a very heavy particle. That means its energy level is very high. 

That causes that c boson sends radiation with very high power. That radiation or wave motion pushes other particles away from it. And c quark flows above the energy level of other particles. When c quark sends enough radiation its shape turns into another particle.  

So could the same thing cause that photon has no mass? In that model, the photon would be in so a high energy level that it also pushes other particles and wave motion away from it. If that thing is right. The radiation of photons is so high that it will send the impacting radiation away from it.  In that case, dominating radiation will blow other radiation away. And that makes it difficult to measure the mass of the object. 

Otherwise, photons can turn wave motion without warning. Sir Isaac Newton proved that light is at the same time wave motion and particle. In that model, the scattering effect will cause that when the light in wave motion or superstring form hits another superstring it can turn into a photon. 

And the same way when a photon hits another photon or superstring. It can turn back to wave motion. That thing is an interaction where energy travels between superstrings and particles depending on which side of the impact has a higher energy level. 

If the wave motion hits the wall with a certain energy level there is the possibility that the wave motion will transfer energy to material with extremely high power. But the impact area of that wave motion or superstring is so small that it cannot interact. Or it's hard to measure the interaction. 

The reason for that is when the superstring travels through the quantum field. That raises the energy level of that field but during that interaction, the superstring itself doesn't make changes to that energy level. So the energy travels out from the quantum field after the energy stress. Not during that stress. The energy flows away from the particle when there is no incoming energy. At that moment energy comes out from the field because the system attempts to reach the minimum energy level. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Researchers think that the multiverse is not fiction anymore.

Multiverse means that our universe is one of many universes. The reason why researchers and scientists believe that this is true is that logical. About 50 years ago people didn't know that there were other solar systems. Exoplanets were only theories in the 80's.  About 400 years ago people thought that our Sun was the only star in the universe. Edvin Hubble proved that our galaxy, Milky Way is one of many galaxies. Then researchers found that galaxies form groups, and supergroups. That means that today we think that the universe, where we live is the ultimate supergroup of galactic supergroups. And logically thinking there should be other universes. We believe that the universe began its existence in an event or series of events called the Big Bang. That event did not begin, because the energy that formed material should come from somewhere. The Big Bang was not one "bang" or explosion. It was a series of events where material took form. Or the energy level that it h

Helium-3 production from tritium.

The fusion energy is theoretical level. The fusion systems are still at the laboratory level. That means there are many problems to overcome before commercial fusion systems. The fusion fuel can be produced from heavy water. The system bombs deuterium with neutrons. Or it can shoot deuterium or some other atoms against each other.  That can create neutron stripping, which transforms deuterium into tritium, and then the laser systems can increase the dividing speed of tritium. In that process, tritium transforms into Heluim-3 (3^He). If the system wants to produce Helium-3 for experimental or pulsed plasma rocket engines, that thing doesn't require that the Helium-3 production must be economical.  Hydrogen's heavy isotopes deuterium and tritium are the most promising fusion fuels. The problem is where the system can produce tritium or Helium3 for the fusion fuel. The 100 million K temperature allows two Heium-3 atoms can create fusion. There is the possibility to produce Hellium

Is some quantum version of the bubble pulse effect behind the dark energy?

  "Dark energy’s role in propelling the universe’s accelerated expansion presents a pivotal challenge in astrophysics, driving ongoing research and space missions dedicated to uncovering the nature of this mysterious force." (ScitechDaily, Deciphering the Dark: The Accelerating Universe and the Quest for Dark Energy)  Is the universe formed in energy projection? That traveled in some kind of space vacuum. That requires. That there was some kind of energy field before the Big Bang.  Quantum field is the common name of all power fields in the universe.  Is dark energy a gravitational version of the bubble pulse effect, that detonates submarines? In the bubble pulse effect, the bubble or some other projection. That travels in the larger bubble causing a very high explosive explosion. So could that effect be possible in electromagnetic and gravitational fields? Gravitational fields differ from electromagnetic fields because of their wavelength.  In some models, the double bubble,