Galaxy's core is frozen in time.

"Researchers have confirmed the presence of an intermediate-mass black hole in the core of Omega Centauri, a cluster that once formed the heart of a separate galaxy. This finding enhances our understanding of black hole evolution and galaxy dynamics. (Artist’s concept.) Credit: SciTechDaily.com" (ScitechDaily, Omega Centauri: A Galaxy Core Frozen in Time Reveals Its Black Hole)

Black holes are enormous objects. They dominate space and time. Time travels backward in the black hole's event horizon. That causes the question: can the particle turn younger forever, even if time is an illusion? The idea of time as an illusion means that time is an energy. And when the particle loses its energy, it loses its mass.

Then energy flows out from particles and turns them older. And sooner or later, the particle turns into radiation or wave movement. Or the ball of superstrings unravels. But then back to the question, can a particle be young forever? The particle turns old because the universe expands. That causes the effect. The quantum fields around the particles turn weaker.

Because the universe loses its energy all the time to space around it. That energy flow causes a situation in which energy flows out from particles because they are on a higher energy level. And energy always travels to the lower energy level. The thing that a forever young particle requires is that it gets replacing energy from outside it.

Near black holes, time is frozen because the energy that travels into a black hole touches those objects. The thing that causes the aging of particles is the expansion of the universe. When the universe expands there is a lower energy level because the space is bigger about the energy and material.

To stop aging the speed of energy or wave movement or strength of energy that hits particles near black holes should turn higher. That thing should compensate for the lower energy level in the universe. But if the energy level of radiation that hits the particle remains the same, that freezes time in particles.

So near the centers of galaxies is an area, where time is frozen. And that thing helps us to understand the time. The case that energy cannot escape from a particle makes it turn younger.

"From left to right: The globular star cluster Omega Centauri as a whole, a zoomed-in version of the central area, and the region in the very center with the location of the mid-size black hole that was identified in the present study marked. Credit: ESA/Hubble, NASA, Maximilian Häberle (MPIA)" (ScitechDaily, Omega Centauri: A Galaxy Core Frozen in Time Reveals Its Black Hole)

The particle (or gravity center looks like a sombrero. The gravity is like a ditch around the particle. If there is empty space between the wall of the ditch and the particle, that empty space makes energy travel out from the particle. When the walls of the ditch are tightly against particles, energy travels in it.

That means the particle is like a hill or dome in a pothole. And the empty area around the particle is like a ditch. That ditch pulls quantum fields in it. The spinning particle acts like a thermal pump, that conducts the quantum fields out from that pothole. When a pothole's walls touch particles it receives energy.

The idea is that when a particle falls from the energy hill. Sooner or later, it sends wave movement. That wave movement forms an energy ditch. When a gravity wave goes out from that point, it causes a situation. That looks similar to the situation. Where the ball falls from the hill to the water. 

The Higgs mechanism and gravity. 

The ball forms the wave by sending a ditch out from the hill. And that ditch pulls the ball away until outcoming water fills that ditch. We can think that the water is an energy field. And the particle that loses its energy is the ball. That model explains some strange things in the gravity behavior. There is an energy ditch in the quantum (energy) field. That causes a situation. That energy- or quantum field travels to that ditch. 

Sooner or later particle's energy level rises so high, that it pushes the gravity walls away. At that moment it forms a hole between the particle and its pothole. And then that allows energy to start to flow out from the particle.

That thing makes it possible to create a model where particle turns old very fast. We must just put a particle into the point, where is an energy minimum. And that makes energy flow out from particles. And if we think that particle is in an energy pothole, the empty area around the particle gives space, where energy can travel.

But if the particle is in the route where energy travels, that thing pushes energy into it. In other cases, the pothole is so tight, that there is no space where the particle can send its energy. And until there comes some kind of space between the particle and the energy pothole the particle turns yuounger or it receives energy.

When a particle's energy level rises high enough, it pushes the energy pothole's walls into a longer distance. And starts to deliver energy to that space. This is the reason why the black holes start to vaporize. The energy just starts to travel to the empty area around the particle.

https://scitechdaily.com/omega-centauri-a-galaxy-core-frozen-in-time-reveals-its-black-hole/

Image; pinterest

See also Higgs field

The neutrinos and antimatter.

Neutrinos are weakly interacting particles. The problem is that neutrinos seem to be born "too easily". That thing means that it's possible that when particle comes out from the stars or nuclear reactors lose their energy very fast, that thing stops or transforms their spin. 

There is a possibility that the electron will travel out from the energy field spin the axle ahead and send an energy impulse. That thing can act like a rocket engine and slow the spin. 

In that model, the EM field can transform particles like electrons into neutrinos. And that thing opens new visions for physics. If that thing is possible, it brings new visions for research that can bring us an unlimited energy source. But neutrinos brig new hypothetical material type in the front of the people eye. 

We all know that there are two possible main types of matter. Those forms are antimatter and material. Every single particle except photons has an anti-particle pair. Same way neutrino has an anti-neutrino pair. That thing means that annihilation between neutrinos and their anti-neutrino pairs is possible.  

The reaction happens when the down quark touches the anti-down quark, or the up-quark touches up-antiquark causing a reaction that breaks the structure. The energy that this reaction releases depends on if other quarks hit their antiquarks. 

The particle's mass has something to do with annihilation and its particle-antiparticle interaction. The photon is the only known particle that has no mass, and a photon also doesn't have antiparticle pair. 

So in annihilation, the mass turns into energy. And somehow the massless particles seem to have no anti-particle pairs. That causes an idea, that maybe the photon is warped traveling wave movement. That traveling wave has no spin. And the hole or ditch ahead that thing pulls photons ahead. 

If material touches dark matter, that causes annihilation where both particles turn into wave movement.  Things like dark matter are hypothetical, and the only confirmed thing in dark matter is this: there is a mysterious gravitational effect in the universe without visible origin. There could also be hypothetical "medium material" that doesn't annihilate either with antimatter or matter. 

If we give color codes for antimatter, hypothetical bi-particle, or medium particle, that will not make annihilation either with material and antimatter and matter we can use the next codes. 

The antimatter is red.

The hypothetical medium particle is yellow. 

The material is green. 

We can think that antimatter is red material. And the material is green. But is there some kind of "yellow" material? That hypothetical material could not form annihilation with material and antimatter. If that medium between antimatter and matter exists, that can form a revolution in physics and technology. 

But then we can think about the shape of that third main type of material. The thing that determines if the particle is matter or antimatter is simple. The spin in the particle is opposite to its antiparticle. So that hypothetical third type of material or "yellow" material could have had the second spin axle. We can think that the normal material and antimatter particles have polar spin, and the third material would spin around the equator. 

So the spin axles of that third particle could form the X-shape structure and the spin of that particle looks like planet Uranus's spin. The poles of particles would be at the ends of the laying axle, and the other standing spin axle makes those poles rotate around that structure. So the particles have horizontal and vertical spin axles. 

Antimatter-material annihilation is possible only between mirror particles. So the thing that makes antimatter storage so difficult is that those particles have opposite electric loads. That means those particle-antiparticle pairs pull them against each other. 

So, when up quark and up-antiquark impact each other that begins the annihilation, and that reaction destroys the proton and antiproton in annihilation between those particles. The reason why antimatter is hard to control is that the antiproton and proton will turn up quarks and the up-antiquarks against each other. But those medium particles are hypothetical. 

https://bigthink.com/hard-science/how-neutrinos-offer-clues-to-the-universes-matter-antimatter-puzzle/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elementary_particle

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Up_quark