What was first: energy or the Big Bang?

The problem with cosmology is the universe’s size. When we think that gravity stretches light that means that massive objects seem to be at longer distances than they really are. The virtual redshift means that massive objects stretch light waves. And that means we see light as more red because of that effect than it really is. So because gravity stretches light all objects seem to be more red than they are.  When we look at objects from different angles the gravity and curvature of light make images distorted. Black holes pull light waves almost straight. And it's possible. The massive gravity pulls electromagnetic radiation longer so much that the visible light or IR radiation turns straight into radio waves. 

Did photons or energy exist before the Big Bang? The answer is that energy cannot come from anywhere. So there should be some kind of wave movement that focuses on the event where material and energy formed in the form as we know them. When we think of the Big Bang as a series of events that turned material and energy into form as we know them, we must realize that even if the Big Bang was only one single event there could be material that is impossible in our universe. In the just born universe energy level was higher. 

And maybe the higher energy quarks like bottom and top quarks could form short-term material like “hydrogen”. Their top quark and bottom quarks form the “proton” and the muon orbits that structure. Those things are impossible in the modern universe. And those structures vanished just after the Big Bang. Just after the Big Bang formed matter and antimatter. Then those particles and their mirror particles formed giant annihilation. So maybe the asymmetry in the wave-particle duality happened when some event like a primordial black hole pushed a little bit of material away from the antimatter. That great annihilation can form black holes because their energy level is so high. 

There are models of the Big Bang as a series of events, and some astronomers searched the place where that event happened. But there is no visible evidence of that place’s existence. There are theories that maybe some material formed a black hole just after the Big Bang. And that black hole could form the center of the universe. The idea is taken from the nuclear bomb explosions. When the Big Bang happened it pushed material into a ring-shaped structure. 

There formed a massive quantum vacuum or cosmic void in the middle of that ring. Then part of the material could fall back to the point where the Big Bang happened. When we think about models there the Big Bang was a series of events. We can imagine a situation where in the space before the Big Bang two strings or superstrings impacted. That impact formed the ring-shaped string called a photon. That photon started to form a quantum vacuum in it. Then that thing caused an effect where the quantum fields started to focus around that point. Then that energy broke out from that point. 

There are also models where the giant “photon” surrounds our universe whose geometrical shape can be like some kind of flat disk. The normal model says that the photons were formed seconds after the Big Bang. So could photons exist before the Big Bang? That could require the existence of the multiverse. The thing is that if those “photons” existed before the Big Bang I must say that they might have very little thing to do with the modern photons. And maybe the Big Bang began when those things formed. 

In String and Brane-theories the thing that began the Big Bang was the hole that formed in the wave movement before the Big Bang. That hole caused the upper Brane or dimension to fall through the energy bottom and smash with that wave movement. That pushed energy into that point forming the particles and energy. So, particles are droplets from the energy impact that happened a long time ago. 

The expansion of the universe supports superstring theory where the universe exists in the giant superstring. That expansion happens because the universe and material release energy into supersting.  In the newest theory time is the only real thing in the universe. And that means everything happens in and because of time. 

https://www.livescience.com/space/cosmology/did-light-exist-at-the-beginning-of-the-universe

The holographic principle and parallel universe.

"The holographic principle is a property of string theories and a supposed property of quantum gravity that states that the description of a volume of space can be thought of as encoded on a lower-dimensional boundary to the region – such as a light-like boundary like a gravitational horizon." (Wikipedia, Holographic principle)

The holographic principle means that the Universe can be a hologram. The idea is that the crossing energy, or superstrings can cause a scattering effect. That effect breaks those strings into pieces. And then material forms in those points where those strings impact with each other. The thing that causes impacts of those superstrings is the expansion of superstrings. The interesting detail in the holographic principle is that this thing means that photons can turn into quarks. 

Then the holographic principle causes an idea that making those photon clouds denser and shooting light waves crossing each other is a possibility to form material. This model means wave-particle duality, WMD. Wave movement can form material and material can turn into wave movement. And the material is only the reflection, an ultra-dense hologram. The model is that the light beams that crossed each other formed the first particles. When we think that time is the only real thing in the universe and the superstring expands all the time, that thing explains why entropy grows all the time. 

The thing that makes parallel universe theory along with the WMD  one of the most interesting models that we can even imagine. The idea is that new universes can form in the points between those universes where radiation that comes from them touches each other. If radiation that comes from another universe is very weak radiation that comes from our universe pushes that radiation away from our universe. If that radiation slides at the edge of our universe’s plasma and photon halo that means we cannot see that radiation. Same way as the heliosphere turns off much of the radiation and plasma that comes from other stars, our galaxy’s halo and the edge of the universe will push weak signals away. If there are other universes there should be similar plasma impact waves that surround our solar system and our galaxy. 

The thing is this: There is evidence against and supporting parallel- or multiverse. The main thing is that there is not enough evidence of that model. The parallel- and multiverse are not the same thing. A parallel universe means that other universes will be in extra dimensions. And the multiverse means that those universes are in 3D spacetime with our universe. 

The model of holographic principle where crossing superstrings forms “electric arcs” that form universes and material. 

**********************************************************************

The evidence that supports and against the multiverse. 

-Cosmic microwave background radiation anomalies: Scientists studying the afterglow of the Big Bang have found strange patterns in space that some believe could be caused by another universe bumping into ours.

-Quantum mechanics experiments: The famous double-slit experiment showed that tiny particles can exist in multiple states at once, which could support the idea of a multiverse.

-Déjà vu and strange phenomena: Some people think that feelings of déjà vu or ghostly encounters could be glimpses of other realities. While this isn’t scientific proof, it’s still a fun idea!

Arguments Against Parallel Universes

-Here are some assumptions that suggest that parallel universes do not exist:

-Lack of direct evidence: So far, we haven’t been able to see or measure parallel universes, making them impossible to confirm.

-Testability issues: For something to be considered scientific, we need to be able to test it. Right now, the idea of a multiverse is more of a theory than a proven fact.

https://scienceandspacenews.com/2025/02/07/are-other-dimensions-real/

**********************************************************************

The parallel universe theory where the Big Bang was only one of many similar cases explains things like exotic particles as their source is in some other universe. If we want to make theories about the beginning of space and time we face one thing. The parallel universe theory is only an extension of the Big Bang Theory. If the universe where we live is only one of many universes that doesn’t answer the question of eternal entirety where universes exist and were formed. 

The eternal entirety is the place where the universes form the bubbles or quantum systems where there can be planets but in some universes, there might not be planets or stars. The problem is to prove that theory is in the stars in our universe. Same way as city lights cause light pollution, galaxies, and other objects cause light pollution, if we want to see things outside our universe we must remove all light that covers that very weak radiation that could uncover other universes' existence.

Logically other universes exist like galaxies, and galaxies form local galaxy clusters. Local galaxy clusters form galactic superclusters. So we can say that the universe is the global galaxy cluster that is part of a larger entirety. But then we can ask can we still see everything? The parallel universe is the next logical step to the model that expands all the time. We know many new details about the universe. The multiverse is a simple thing that is hard to prove. But then we can remember. How our worldview increases. 

Before Nicolaus Copernikus people believed that the Earth was the center of the universe. Then Galileo Galilei proved that four moons orbiting Jupiter. After that Hubble proved that the Milky Way is only one of billions of galaxies. Then astronomers found local and superclusters of galaxies. The next thing that astronomers found was the “cosmic web” the largest known megastructure in the universe. And then the new step would be the parallel universe. 

Another universe can exist in our universe, places like black holes. Or it can exist outside our universe. It can form visible or dark matter. And in theory, their time can travel backward. Those universes are things that can be proven in the future. The problem is that the universe covers radiation that comes from other universes if they exist.  The other problem is that we live in a galaxy. Galaxies are ultimately massive objects. They pull dark and visible material around them as halos. 

Those halos form light pollution that the dimmest light cannot pass. The other problem with that thing is that the material between galaxies can be thinner than nobody expected. And if we continue that induction thinking we can think that quantum fields and material between hypothetical multiverse universes is much more thin than nobody even imagined. That means radiation from other universes can be much weaker than we even imagine. 

. 

https://bigthink.com/starts-with-a-bang/evidence-parallel-universe/

https://phys.org/news/2025-05-bridging-worlds-physicists-holographic-principle.html

https://phys.org/news/2025-06-theory-dimensions-space-secondary-effect.html

https://scitechdaily.com/is-the-universe-a-hologram-schrodingers-100-year-old-equation-still-holds-the-key/

https://scienceandspacenews.com/2025/02/07/are-other-dimensions-real/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave%E2%80%93particle_duality

The new theory suggests that time is the only thing in the universe.

When the universe expands. The quantum fields inside it turn weaker. That causes energy to flow from the material. There is the possibility to deny that energy flow if something pulls the same energy dose to a particle that is left from its environment. That compensates for energy flow out from the particle. When energy travels into the particle it turns younger. When energy travels out of a particle. It makes it older. If we compensate for energy flow out from particles that raise the energy level difference between the particle and its environment. That causes situations where energy travels faster out from particles when energy pumping stops. And that thing destroys the material. 

We can stop time in particles if we can keep their energy level the same. As you can read from above, that happens by compensating the environment's energy level decrease by pumping as much energy in the particle as lost from its environment. Because energy travels to a lower energy level the energy pump denies particles from sending wave movement. That means when the expansion of the universe decreases the energy level of the quantum field the particle must get the same energy dose from somewhere. There is the possibility that the ball-shaped chamber. Where the system can pump as much energy as lost from its environment and can store the data in quantum mode forever. 

Sometimes we compare time to path. But the problem is that time moves. The expansion of the universe causes a situation where material vaporizes, or turns into wave movement. However, we must also realize that the expansion of the universe is not as easy to model as researchers initially thought. There are theories about cosmic fluid. That means all galaxy superclusters are going in the same direction. And if that is true galaxies and galactic superclusters orbit the same point, the hypothetical center of the universe. 

The other thing is that researchers found the missing material. Most visible and dark materials are in halos around galaxies. But sometimes that material escapes from galaxies. The relativistic jet of the supermassive black holes pushes material out from the galaxy. Same way other galaxies or their black holes steal material from larger galaxies. Black holes do not only pull material in it. Their radiation from the transition disk and relativistic jet push material away. In the same way, radiation from galaxies can also push material clouds from around it. 

Material is not spread homogeneously in the universe. Things like particles are only compressed forms of energy. The material is spread into the cosmic web. 

There is a new theory about 3D time. The idea is taken from some versions of string theory. The idea is that time can basically move only in one direction. When time moves forward that causes expansion in the superstrings and that causes the “electric arcs” that we think of as “Big Bangs”. The key element in those models is that there can be multiple universes and spaces or states of wave movement internally. 

This is one of the things that makes the time an interesting thing. There can be universes where time travels backward. The idea is that those other, still hypothetical universes can pull material or energy into them. And then if that really happens and those other universes don’t expand that means energy density, or energy level in those universes rise. And then that means material turns younger in those other, still hypothetical universes. 

The new theory says that time has three axles. (X, Y, Z) like in space. Time is like a tube where the roof is the top of the “Y”-axle. The bottom of the Y axle is the bottom of the tube. The tube expands all the time. And that causes material vaporization or turning into wave movement. That causes quantum fog or photon clouds. That prevents us from seeing the future and limits our possibility to see the past. 

But time is the force. Where all other events and phenomena happen. The past and future, or X-axle time are quite easy to understand. But Y and Z axle times are harder to understand. That means there can be “up” and “down” time. Those “up” and “down” times are energy maximum and energy minimum. 

If that thing is possible that makes time travel or information teleportation back in time “easier than we thought”. Making that thing can happen by going in “up” or “down” time. How can we describe that thing? Maybe we can say that time is like a river. The surface of the river is the “up” time. And the bottom of the river is “down” time.  When material travels in time it releases wave movement. And that thing causes a scattering effect. When material releases energy or wave movement that thing denies energy flow against the time. There are also whirls in time. In those whirls that we see as black holes, time can move backward. 

And flow near shores are the “edges of the time”. So how can we put information travel back in time? How to swim against the flow? We must go to places where time moves slower. If we want to travel back to flow we must not try from the middle of the flow. We must try to be near the bottom or near the shores. In those points, river flow is as slow as possible. When we travel to the energy minimum the energy flow from the material is as slow as possible. 

https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/XMM-Newton/The_models_were_right_astronomers_find_missing_matter

https://phys.org/news/2025-06-theory-dimensions-space-secondary-effect.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brane

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiverse

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

Gravitons, photons, and string theory.

Above: A spiral galaxy is actually a material disk around a supermassive black hole. 

If a graviton is the black hole in the middle of a photon that thing is a small but very powerful particle. When we look at the black holes in the universe we can see that those phenomena pull material into them from extremely large areas. The Sagittarius A’s size is about the same as the solar system. But it forms a spiral galaxy around it. 

That means that if the photon is a structure that is formed around the quantum-size black hole, that means the quantum black hole could be the graviton, the missing gravitation transmitting particle. But that particle is extremely small if we compare it with a photon. In this model, the photon is an energy ring that locks that quantum black hole into its form. That means photons are the energy field that denies the quantum black hole explosion. 

Or if the superstring or string theory is true we can say that if a photon is lost. That pushes a black hole into that superstring. An energy field that falls behind it impacts the superstring. In string theory, superstrings form all particles and energy fields. Those strings can be like rings, or they can be very long lines. And that means those 2D strings form everything. 

The idea is that the hypothetical superstring that the photon surrounds acts like a thermal pump that puts energy flow away from that point. 

"A new theory, that explains how light and matter interact at the quantum level has enabled researchers to define for the first time the precise shape of a single photon. Credit: Dr. Benjamin Yuen" (ScitechDaily, Quantum Leap: Scientists Reveal the Shape of a Single Photon for the First Time)

The question is how can that thing form? The answer could be in the Kugelblitz black hole. The black hole can form from energy or from superstrings. The idea is that the photon that we see is an energy ring around the superstring. When the energy that comes out starts to push that string in that point, that makes energy move in and on that string. Superstring can be thinner than quark. But it can be as long as the diameter of the universe. So, when the energy level in that point starts to rise it puts energy to move out from that point. The rising energy level at that point puts energy moving faster at that superstring. 

That thing starts to pull energy out from that point so fast that all wave movement goes with that thing. In this model, the photon is the impact field around the superstring that cannot take all energy away from that point. The photon is the energy field that outcomes energy locks around the energy hill that makes energy move in the superstring. This means the black holes are like extremely powerful thermal pumps that make energy flow away from the point where they are so fast that quantum fields around them start to travel to that point with such high speed that light or any other wave movement cannot escape from that point. 

When we think that a photon is the ring-shaped energy field around some kind of superstring, the next question is how that superstring turns into a supermassive black hole. That happens when those superstrings are starting to tie around each other like a rope. That kind of thing can form extremely large black holes. But the requirement is that those structures must not let energy away from them. So maybe at least large-size Kugelblitz black holes cannot form in the modern universe. There is so much free space or surrounding quantum fields are so weak that the rope-shaped structure of superstrings will be broken. 

The black hole is in the interaction between it and its environment. Outcoming energy or quantum fields press that structure together. And in the young universe, those quantum fields were much stronger than in our universe. They pressed those superstrings together. And that means it's possible that in the very young universe the Kugelblitz black holes formed before material. That is one way to think about the most interesting phenomenon in the universe. Proving that thing requires proving string theory. And that is not an easy thing. 

https://scitechdaily.com/quantum-leap-scientists-reveal-the-shape-of-a-single-photon-for-the-first-time/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

The eternal question is: which came first, material or black holes?

"An illustration (not to scale) of a primordial black hole growing to supermassive size. (Image credit: Robert Lea (created with Canva))" (Space.com, Tiny ‘primordial’ black holes created in the Big Bang may have rapidly grown to supermassive sizes)

If Kugelblitz- or black holes formed of radiation could be possible that explains how black holes could form before materia. In a very young universe, there was only radiation and energy. The thing that causes discussions is the question of which came first, black holes or regular material. 

And did those primordial black holes form even before photons? Theoretically, it is possible to press a photon into a black hole by surrounding it with a thin energy string. If that energy string or energy lasso pumps enough energy to the photon it can turn into a small black hole. There is another possibility that allows that black hole to form straight from radiation. 

That thing is that it’s possible that the radiation forms the energy pool. That large low-energy space can cause a situation where energy falls into the middle of it. That fallen energy impacts in the middle of that point. And there, the energy level rises so high, that there is a black hole. Theoretically, those Kugelblitz black holes are possible but they need lots of energy. And maybe those things could form in the young universe where the energy level was higher. But they cannot form in the modern universe, except in special situations where two black holes explode near each other. That can cause so high energy radiation that it can from the Kugelblitz.  

In models, photons are wheel-shaped energy fields. There is a possibility that photons can form from “emptiness”. Or if two quantum fields impact each other they can form photons. And it's possible that some systems can press photons into the small, quantum-sized black hole. The photon itself is like some donut, so that causes the theorem that the graviton, the hypothetical gravitation transmitter particle, could be a quantum-size black hole that is in the middle of the photon. So if the graviton is in the middle of the photon, we can make an induction model, where dark matter could be gravitons or quantum black holes without that halo. 

The cosmic vacuum can also form light. The idea is that the vacuum makes energy travel into that bubble. When that energy field impacts the vacuum’s wall, it turns those fields into light. So the light is the wave movement that forms in the impacts of those quantum fields. It’s like noise that forms when water flow impacts the water surface. 

Primordial black holes could form straight from radiation that escaped from the Big Bang. 

In this case, the event called Big Bang means the event or series of events that formed the universe as we know it. That even could be some kind of black hole explosion or something else that made energy move. When that event happened it sent radiation across the space. Then a little bit of that radiation or superstrings that formed the radiation turned around. That caused the superstring to turn around some other radiation packages. And that caused the energy level to rise at that point. 

If photons existed in that time, the radiation string that surrounded the photon could start to pump energy into it. And that could form the first black hole. There was more radiation and the energy level in the young universe was far higher than in the modern universe. So if something formed the primordial black hole that thing will get more energy than black hole that exists in the modern universe. And that means even the primordial black holes could grow into enormous size faster than in the modern universe. 

Researchers are really interested in things like Kugelblitz black holes. Those things can offer a new way to transport information. They can form the other side in the superpositioned and entangled particle pairs. But those may be microscopic black holes that offer new types of energy sources. They can also offer the possibility to see details of the subatomic particles by benefiting those black hole jets. The fact is that those black holes can be very stable if outside energy cannot let energy flow away from that point. 

https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a65046120/light-from-nothing/

https://scitechdaily.com/quantum-leap-scientists-reveal-the-shape-of-a-single-photon-for-the-first-time/

https://www.space.com/astronomy/black-holes/tiny-primordial-black-holes-created-in-the-big-bang-may-have-rapidly-grown-to-supermassive-sizes

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graviton

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kugelblitz_(astrophysics)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

The fifth force can hide in atoms.

"The Standard Model of physics doesn't account for everything we see. (ScienceAlert)

Researchers hunt for the fifth force. It is possible that the fifth force is the mirror gravitation. The idea comes from gravity’s special nature.  Gravity has no repelling effect, so can the mythical fifth force have only a repelling effect. And could that force be the key to understanding why electrons don’t fall to the atom’s nucleus? In that new model, the fifth force is the interaction between neutrons and the atom’s electron shells or electrons. 

In this model, the interaction between electron and proton and electron and neutron are separated. The fifth force could explain why dark matter became more dominating than visible material, but why does dark matter have only gravitational interaction with visible material? 

There is a possibility that the fifth force’s origin is in the subatomic particles like quarks or neutrons. If a particle looks like a whisk it can collect energy or wave movement from its environment.  So-called superstrings form that structure. That causes oscillation and that oscillation sends energy waves to the middle of the particle. When those strings oscillate they send wave movement in both directions in and out from particles. That packs energy into the particle until it can break itself out. 

There are four fundamental forces that we know. 

1 Gravity

2 Electromagnetism

3 Weak nuclear force

4 Strong nuclear force. 

So where should researchers look for the fifth force? One of the most promising places would be in atoms. Researchers know the electromagnetic interaction that is the interaction between an atom's nucleus and its electron core. But the interaction between positive protons and negative electrons has the dominating effect on that thing. The missing interaction is the interaction between neutrons and electrons. Neutrons are neutral particles. They have N and S poles and that makes a model where wave movement with N-polarity hits a neutron's S pole possible. Some kind of wave movement can leave from the neutron's equator. 

In that model, a neutron collects or focuses quantum fields from protons and then that energy flow causes radiation to the particle’s equator. The thing that makes the fifth force interesting is that force could be missing gravity’s pushing effect. An interesting thing is that gravity has no pushing effect. So the fifth force can be the missing “antigravity”. There is also another interesting detail in the neutron’s structure. Those particles exist only about 15 minutes (880 sec.) outside the atom. 

That thing means that it’s possible that the “fifth force” blows neutrons. There are only three quarks in a neutron. The higher energy down quarks-pair and one up quark. Energy flows from down quarks to up quarks. That can form the situation that the energy stretches a quantum field around those quarks. And that can cause vaporization in quarks. But when we observe atoms we must remember that we see them as entirety. We see all of those four fundamental interactions. And that means if we want to see the fifth force we must filter maybe all other forces away. 

All fundamental interactions have their own transmitter particle. They all have the wave movement form that wavelength depends on the size of the transmitter particle. So theoretically we could transform gravity straight to the electromagnetic wave movement if we have the right particle. The gravity wave is the energy ditch that travels in the universe. When that energy ditch faces a particle it pulls a little bit of energy out from the particle. That energy is the wave movement that is possible to catch. This is one of the things that can revolutionize our way of thinking about material. 

https://www.sciencealert.com/a-fifth-force-of-nature-may-have-been-discovered-inside-atoms

Can entropy form gravity?

The entropic system can have a gravity effect. But the system itself cannot form anything visible. Gravitation surrounds all objects in the universe. The idea of quantum gravitation is that the gravitation is the sum of all particles of the system. There is a possibility that if extremely high energy objects form the swarming entirety they cannot form visible structure. The swarming particles can form a thing called entropic gravitation. But is it possible that entropy is the thing that forms gravity? In some theories the WIMPs weakly interacting massive particles are some kind of swarming versions of the particles. 

When certain types of particles swarm like dust and pull energy inside them that thing causes a situation where it forms a pothole in the quantum field. That causes an energy flow that tries to fill that point. But those spinning particles in that particle cloud bind all energy into themselves. The particles act like dust clouds but they cannot form bigger objects, because energy waves push and pull them back and forth. Those particles have no time to create bonds. We cannot see those particles because energy flows in one direction. 

That means we cannot see them. Without reflection, particles are invisible. And if that happens that explains why we cannot see graviton-particles,  the hypothetical gravity transmitter. There is the possibility that a graviton is a fast-spinning particle that conducts energy to the spin axle where it forms a similar beam as black holes. But that beam is very thin. If that thin beam travels through the particles it might not cause strong changes in their energy fields. The beam can stretch that energy field. But it doesn't cause strong oscillation. The oscillation can be like waves in the particle's quantum field. If a particle makes wave movement flow across its surface it is invisible to the observer. 

Same way if particles bind quantum fields into them there is a possibility that the fast-swarming particles can form a channel between two objects. If there swarming particles between two objects that form a channel the particles cannot create resistance. The idea is quite similar in cases where the soap goes in water. That causes a situation in which water loses its surface tension. So this point or channel acts like some kind of vacuum between those particles or objects. 

There is one form or vision of the quantum stealth systems that can change games. Decrease the laser beam effect. That thing is based on the idea that energy can form waves that travel on the system shell travel in one direction. That means that those waves can push quantum fields around that object in one direction or with them. That thing makes it possible to aim reflection in some other direction than to the observer. The idea is that the energy wave travels on the object shell and pushes wave movement in one direction. Same way in regular antennas the wave that travels on the antenna's shell pumps informative radio waves into some direction. 

There is the possibility that entropic gravity forms when energy flows over a particle's shell or its quantum fields. If those waves from particles impact with other energy waves that come from other particles in the system. That can create quantum dots that push those particles away from each other. 

The idea of entropic gravity is interesting. When we think about rising entropy in the system we can make a model where the entropy grows also in the most dense objects in the universe. So the densest objects in the universe involve so huge entropy that is packed in the small point that it makes a similar effect as the cosmic vacuum or extreme void in the universe. Entropy gravity means that a large group of particles swarm and pull energy out from some point. The swarming particles can pull entire points empty or bind all quantum fields into themselves. 

So because particles swarm like some kind of dust in the room they cannot form any kinds of visible objects. And that can also explain why gravity behaves like it behaves. When we think about things like cosmic nebulas there is lots of entropy in the system. If that thing falls into a black hole there is a possibility that the entropy, or number of entropic particles is the same. But the movement, or entropic area is smaller. That means the particles that form gravity oscillate in the smaller area. That means the relation between entropy out- and inside that system is the same. 

https://phys.org/news/2016-12-verlinde-theory-gravity.html

https://www.quantamagazine.org/is-gravity-just-entropy-rising-long-shot-idea-gets-another-look-20250613/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropic_gravity